Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cisplatin, epirubicin, and vindesine with or without lonidamine in the treatment of inoperable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
Ianniello, G P; De Cataldis, G; Comella, P; Scarpati, M D; Maiorino, A; Brancaccio, L; Cioffi, R; Lombardi, A; Carnicelli, P; Tinessa, V.
Afiliación
  • Ianniello GP; Department of Medical Oncology, G. Rummo Hospital, Benevento, Italy.
Cancer ; 78(1): 63-9, 1996 Jul 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8646728
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lonidamine (LND) is an indazol-carboxylic acid derivative that selectively inhibits the energy metabolism of neoplastic cells, and increases the permeability of cell membranes. In vitro studies have demonstrated that LND can potentiate the oncolytic activity of cytotoxic drugs and is able to reverse the acquired multidrug resistance of neoplastic cells. Some clinical trials have suggested a synergism of LND with alkylating agents, cisplatin, and anthracyclines in various solid tumors.

METHODS:

From June 1990 to June 1993, 158 previously untreated patients with Stage IIIB and IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled into a multicentric randomized trial to evaluate the addition of LND to a cisplatin-epirubicin-vindesine regimen. Eighty patients in the control arm (A) received cisplatin, 60 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.); epirubicin, 60 mg/m2 i.v.; and vindesine, 3 mg/m2 i.v. (PEV), on Day 1 every 4 weeks, whereas 78 patients in the experimental arm (B) received the same regimen with the addition of LND from 75 mg orally three times on Day 1 to 150 mg orally three times on Day 7+ until tumor progression occurred.

RESULTS:

The experimental treatment achieved a significantly higher proportion of major responses in comparison with the control regimen (43% vs. 24%; P=0.02). The addition of LND apparently potentiated the activity of this cytotoxic treatment, particularly in patients with metastatic disease (overall response rate, 39% vs. 17%). The median time to progression (5 vs. 8 months; P=0.0007) and the median survival time (7.6 vs. 11 months; P=0.0013) were also statistically improved in Arm B. The acute toxicity of the 2 treatments was low only 6% of patients in Arm A and 4% of patients in Arm B had to withdraw from treatment due to Grade 4 World Health Organization toxicity. The main additional side effects related to the administration of LND were epigastralgia, myalgia, asthenia, and orchialgia. However, these symptoms were mild and controlled by the concomitant administration of low doses of steroids.

CONCLUSIONS:

The mild acute toxicity of the PEV regimen and the acceptable and nonoverlapping additional side effects of LND render our experimental therapy worthy of consideration for the management of NSCLC patients with poor performance status or low tolerance to more aggressive therapeutic approaches.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 1996 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 1996 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia