Renal parenchyma-sparing surgery in carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the role of renal-sparing surgery in patients with kidney cancer who have a functioning contralateral kidney. METHODS: The present study aimed to review the recent experience of renal-sparing surgery at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney. Eighteen consecutive patients undergoing conservative surgery for kidney tumours at RPAH between February 1987 and January 1995, were reviewed. Eleven patients had imperative indications for conservative surgery and the remaining seven patients had elective indications. Ten patients had modified enucleation with a margin of normal parenchyma. Six patients underwent partial nephrectomy and two had wedge resections. Patients were followed up at 1, 6 and 12 months, and thence every 6-12 months. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 104 months (mean: 46.2 months, median: 48 months). RESULTS: Sixteen of the 18 patients were still alive at the end of the follow-up (October 1995), with no clinical evidence of local or distant metastasis. The two deaths were not related to the fact that these patients had conservative surgery. The average tumour dimensions were 43 mm x 49 mm, with an average volume of 194 mm3. All resections were complete, with margins ranging between 1.0 and 20.0 mm (mean: 8.7 mm). The survival rate in the present study is comparable to those found by other researchers. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative surgery is indicated in renal tumours where radical surgery would render the patient anephric. Conservative surgery, however, is controversial in a patient with a normal contralateral kidney. The present study has shown that renal parenchyma-preserving surgery for localized tumours provides a feasible treatment option.