Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chinese medicine (Q-14) in the Treatment of Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Single-center, Open label, Randomised Controlled Trial
Jia Liu; Wei Yang; Yue Liu; Cheng Lv; Lianguo Ruan; Chen Zhao; Ruili Huo; Xin Shen; Qing Miao; Wenliang Lv; Hao Li; Huaxin Shi; Lijie Hu; Zhixu Yang; Li Zhang; Bing Wang; Guoju Dong; Yongyue Xian; Bin Li; Zhenqi Zhou; Chunyan Xu; Yingying Chen; Yongjun Bian; Jing Guo; Jinliang Yang; Jian Wang; Wensheng Qi; Suping Chen; Yang Chen; Bei Yan; Wei Wang; Jing Li; Xiaolei Xie; Ming Xu; Jianxin Jiang; Gang Wang; Xiaodong Cong; Haoning Zhu; Jiaheng Shi; Luxing Leng; Dongxu Li; Lanping Guo; Luqi Huang.
Afiliación
  • Jia Liu; Institute of Basic research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences , Beijing, China
  • Wei Yang; Institute of Basic research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences , Beijing, China
  • Yue Liu; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Cheng Lv; Institute of Basic research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences , Beijing, China
  • Lianguo Ruan; Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China
  • Chen Zhao; Institute of Basic research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences , Beijing, China
  • Ruili Huo; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
  • Xin Shen; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing, China
  • Qing Miao; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Wenliang Lv; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Hao Li; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Huaxin Shi; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
  • Lijie Hu; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
  • Zhixu Yang; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Li Zhang; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Bing Wang; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Guoju Dong; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Yongyue Xian; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Bin Li; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Zhenqi Zhou; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Chunyan Xu; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Yingying Chen; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Yongjun Bian; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Jing Guo; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Jinliang Yang; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Jian Wang; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Wensheng Qi; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Suping Chen; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Yang Chen; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Bei Yan; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Wei Wang; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Jing Li; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Xiaolei Xie; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Ming Xu; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Jianxin Jiang; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Gang Wang; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Xiaodong Cong; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Haoning Zhu; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Jiaheng Shi; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Luxing Leng; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Dongxu Li; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Lanping Guo; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Chinese Materia Medica Resource Center, Beijing, China
  • Luqi Huang; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China; China Center for Evidence-based Medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Me
Preprint en En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-21249417
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine (Q-14) plus standard care compared with standard care alone in adult with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Study DESIGNSingle-center, open label, randomised controlled trial. SETTINGWuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Wuhan, China, February 27 to March 27, 2020. PARTICIPANTS204 patients with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 were randomised in to treatment group and control group, which was 102 patients each group. INTERVENTIONSIn treatment group, Q-14 was administrated at 10g (granules), twice daily for 14 days and plus standard care. In control group, patients were given standard care alone for 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREThe primary outcome was conversion time of SARS-CoV-2 viral assay. Adverse events were analyzed in the safety population. RESULTSAmong 204 patients, 195 were analyzed according to the intention to treat principle. There were 149 patients (71 vs. 78 in treatment group and control group respectively) turning to negative via SARS-CoV-2 viral assay. No statistically significance showed in conversion time between treatment group and control group (FAS Median (IQR) 10.00 (9.00-11.00) vs. 10.00 (9.00-11.00); Mean rank 67.92 vs. 81.44; P=0.051.). Time to recovery of fever was shorter in treatment group as compared in control group. The disappearance rate of symptom in cough, fatigue, chest discomfort was significantly higher in treatment group. In chest computed tomography (Chest CT) examinations, overall evaluation of chest CT examination after treatment compared with baseline showed more patients improved in treatment group .There were no significant differences in the other outcomes. CONCLUSIONAdministration of Q-14 on standard care for COVID-19 was useful for improvement of symptoms (such as fever, cough, fatigue and chest discomfort), while did not result in a significantly higher probability of negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2 viral assay. No serious adverse events were reported. TRIAL REGISTRATIONChiCTR2000030288
Licencia
cc_no
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Experimental_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Preprint
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Experimental_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Preprint