Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Protection against Omicron BA.2 reinfection conferred by primary Omicron or pre-Omicron infection with and without mRNA vaccination
Sara Carazo; Danuta M Skowronski; Marc Brisson; Sapha Barkati; Chantal Sauvageau; Nicholas Brousseau; Rodica M Gilca; Judith Fafard; Denis Talbot; Manale Ouakki; Vladimir Gilca; Alex Carignan; Geneviève Deceuninck; Philippe De wals; Gaston De Serres.
Afiliación
  • Sara Carazo; Institut de santé publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  • Danuta M Skowronski; BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Marc Brisson; CHU de Qué - Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  • Sapha Barkati; McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Chantal Sauvageau; Institut de santé publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  • Nicholas Brousseau; Institut de santé publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  • Rodica M Gilca; Institut de santé publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  • Judith Fafard; Laboratoire de Santé Publique du Québec, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Quebec, Canada
  • Denis Talbot; CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  • Manale Ouakki; Institut de santé publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  • Vladimir Gilca; Institut de santé publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  • Alex Carignan; Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrook,Quebec, Canada
  • Geneviève Deceuninck; CHU de Qué- Université Laval, Quebec city, Quebec, Canada
  • Philippe De wals; Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  • Gaston De Serres; Institut de santé publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
Preprint en En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-22276824
ABSTRACT
BackgroundWe estimated the protection against the Omicron BA.2 variant associated with prior primary infection (PI) due to pre-Omicron or Omicron BA.1 virus, with and without mRNA vaccination. MethodsA test-negative case-control study was conducted among healthcare workers (HCWs) tested for SARS-CoV-2 in Quebec, Canada, between March 27 and June 4, 2022, when BA.2 predominated and was presumptively diagnosed. Logistic regression models compared the likelihood of BA.2 reinfection (second positive test [≥]30 days after PI) among HCWs with history of PI and none to three doses of mRNA vaccine versus infection-naive, unvaccinated HCWs. FindingsAmong 37,732 presumed BA.2 cases, 2,521 (6.7%) and 659 (1.7%) were reinfections following pre-Omicron or BA.1 PI, respectively. Among 73,507 controls, 7,360 (10.0%) and 12,315 (16.8%) had a pre-Omicron or BA.1 PI, respectively. Pre-Omicron PI was associated with 38% (95%CI19-53) reduction in BA.2 infection risk, with higher BA.2 protection among those also vaccinated with one (56%), two (69%) or three (70%) vaccine doses. Omicron BA.1 PI was associated with greater protection against BA.2 (72%; 95%CI65-78), higher among two-dose vaccinated at 96% (95%CI95-96) but not improved with a third dose (96%; 95%CI95-97). Hybrid Omicron BA.1 PI plus two or three dose vaccine-induced protection persisted for five months post-infection. InterpretationTwice-vaccinated individuals who experienced BA.1 infection were subsequently well-protected for a prolonged period against BA.2 reinfection and derived no meaningful added benefit against BA.2 from a third dose of mRNA vaccine.
Licencia
cc_by_nc
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Preprint
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Preprint