Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 interferon-γ release assay following SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination
Sile Ann Johnson; Eloise Phillips; Sandra Adele; Stephanie A Longet; Tom Malone; Chris Mason; Lizzie Stafford; Anni Jamsen; Siobhan Gardiner; Alexandra Deeks; Janice Neo; Emily J Blurton; Jemima White; Mohammad Ali; Barbara Kronsteiner-Dobramysl; Donal Skelly; Katie JM Jeffery; Christopher P Conlon; Philip Goulder; Miles Carroll; Ellie Barnes; Paul Klenerman; Susanna Dunachie; - PITCH Consortium.
Afiliación
  • Sile Ann Johnson; University of Oxford
  • Eloise Phillips; University of Oxford
  • Sandra Adele; University of Oxford
  • Stephanie A Longet; University of Oxford
  • Tom Malone; University of Oxford
  • Chris Mason; University of Oxford
  • Lizzie Stafford; University of Oxford
  • Anni Jamsen; University of Oxford
  • Siobhan Gardiner; University of Oxford
  • Alexandra Deeks; University of Oxford
  • Janice Neo; UHDB
  • Emily J Blurton; UHDB
  • Jemima White; University of Oxford
  • Mohammad Ali; University of Oxford
  • Barbara Kronsteiner-Dobramysl; University of Oxford
  • Donal Skelly; University of Oxford
  • Katie JM Jeffery; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Christopher P Conlon; University of Oxford
  • Philip Goulder; University of Oxford
  • Miles Carroll; University of Oxford
  • Ellie Barnes; University of Oxford
  • Paul Klenerman; University of Oxford
  • Susanna Dunachie; University of Oxford
  • - PITCH Consortium;
Preprint en En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-22279558
ABSTRACT
BackgroundT cells are important in preventing severe disease from SARS-CoV-2, but scalable and field-adaptable alternatives to expert T cell assays are needed. The interferon-gamma release assay QuantiFERON platform was developed to detect T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 from whole blood with relatively basic equipment and flexibility of processing timelines. Methods48 participants with different infection and vaccination backgrounds were recruited. Whole blood samples were analysed using the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay in parallel with the well-established Protective Immunity from T Cells in Healthcare workers (PITCH) ELISpot, which can evaluate spike-specific T cell responses. AimsThe primary aims of this cross-sectional observational cohort study were to establish if the QuantiFERON SARS-Co-V-2 assay could discern differences between specified groups and to assess the sensitivity of the assay compared to the PITCH ELISpot. FindingsThe QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 distinguished acutely infected individuals (12-21 days post positive PCR) from naive individuals (p< 0.0001) with 100% sensitivity and specificity for SARS-CoV-2 T cells, whilst the PITCH ELISpot had reduced sensitivity (62.5%) for the acute infection group. Sensitivity with QuantiFERON for previous infection was 12.5% (172-444 days post positive test) and was inferior to the PITCH ELISpot (75%). Although the QuantiFERON assay could discern differences between unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals (55-166 days since second vaccination), the latter also had reduced sensitivity (55.5%) compared to the PITCH ELISpot (66.6%). ConclusionThe QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay showed potential as a T cell evaluation tool soon after SARS-CoV-2 infection but has lower sensitivity for use in reliable evaluation of vaccination or more distant infection. Graphical abstractWith the exception of acute infection group, the PITCH ELISpot S1+S2 had greater sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell responses compared with the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay tube Ag3. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=64 SRC="FIGDIR/small/22279558v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (13K) org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1913a88org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@199b88corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12309cborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15807a0_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Licencia
cc_by
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Cohort_studies / Diagnostic_studies / Experimental_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Preprint
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Cohort_studies / Diagnostic_studies / Experimental_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Preprint