Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes between Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Bullous Keratopathy
Article en En | WPRIM | ID: wpr-160782
Biblioteca responsable: WPRO
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare 2-year clinical outcomes of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with bullous keratopathy.

METHODS:

A retrospective chart review was performed to obtain 2 years of follow-up data of DSAEK or PK at a single center from March 2009 to September 2012. The study comprised 15 eyes of DSAEK and 11 eyes of PK. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical and keratometric changes, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure, and postoperative complications. Graft survival rate was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS:

There were no differences in patient baseline characteristics between the two groups. At postoperative 2 years, better BCVA of 0.69 ± 0.51 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) was found after DSAEK compared to 0.88 ± 0.48 logMAR after PK. Refractive cylinder in DSAEK and PK was −2.60 ± 1.53 and −6.00 ± 1.05 diopters (D), respectively, and keratometric cylinder was 3.27 ± 3.70 and 6.34 ± 3.51 D, respectively, at postoperative 2 years. The difference of mean spherical equivalents between postoperative 1 month and 2 years was 0.84 D after DSAEK and 2.05 D after PK. A hyperopic shift of 1.17 D was present after 2 years of DSAEK. The mean endothelial cell density at postoperative 2 years was 1,548 ± 456 cells/mm² for DSAEK and 1,052 ± 567 cells/mm² for PK, with a cell loss of 19.96% vs. 52.38%, respectively when compared to postoperative 1 month. No significant difference in central corneal thickness was found between DSAEK and PK (592 ± 75 vs. 563 ± 90 µm, respectively). Finally, the 2-year survival rate did not differ significantly between DSAEK and PK (93.3% vs. 81.8%, respectively, p = 0.344).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared to PK, DSAEK provided more stable refractive errors with better visual outcome, lower endothelial cell loss, and a lower rate of graft rejection at postoperative 2 years in patients with bullous keratopathy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: WPRIM Asunto principal: Refracción Ocular / Factores de Tiempo / Agudeza Visual / Estudios Retrospectivos / Estudios de Seguimiento / Queratoplastia Penetrante / Resultado del Tratamiento / Córnea / Enfermedades de la Córnea / Queratoplastia Endotelial de la Lámina Limitante Posterior Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Korean Journal of Ophthalmology Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article
Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: WPRIM Asunto principal: Refracción Ocular / Factores de Tiempo / Agudeza Visual / Estudios Retrospectivos / Estudios de Seguimiento / Queratoplastia Penetrante / Resultado del Tratamiento / Córnea / Enfermedades de la Córnea / Queratoplastia Endotelial de la Lámina Limitante Posterior Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Korean Journal of Ophthalmology Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article