Comparison of homemade and imported HbsAg ELISA kits on screening blood samples / 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志
Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
; (6): 84-86, 2006.
Article
en Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-305517
Biblioteca responsable:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>To evaluate homemade and imported HbsAg ELISA kits on screening blood donors.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Samples for evaluation included 120 HbsAg serum plates for the golden criteria and 400 sets of serum from blood donors in Dongguan. The samples underwent blind screening with homemade and imported ELISA kits respectively.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The sensitivity of homemade (Xinchuang) and imported (Diasorin) HbsAg ELISA kit were 85.71% (72/84) and 100% (84/84), respectively. Their specificity was 100% (436/436) and 96.55% (421/436) respectively. The consistency of two ELISA kits was 100%.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The imported ELISA kit had the highest sensitivity, but its specificity was not as good as that of homemade ELISA kit. The two kinds of ELISA kits had good repetition. The combination of the two reagents may ensure the safety of blood transfusion.</p>
Texto completo:
1
Base de datos:
WPRIM
Asunto principal:
Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico
/
Estándares de Referencia
/
Sangre
/
Donantes de Sangre
/
Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática
/
China
/
Tamizaje Masivo
/
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
/
Sensibilidad y Especificidad
/
Diagnóstico
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Screening_studies
Límite:
Humans
País/Región como asunto:
Asia
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
Año:
2006
Tipo del documento:
Article
Pais de publicación:
CHINA
/
CN
/
REPUBLIC OF CHINA