Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does the position of response options in multiple-choice tests matter?
Hohensinn, Christine; Baghaei, Purya.
Affiliation
  • Hohensinn, Christine; University of Vienna. Vienna. Austria
  • Baghaei, Purya; Islamic Azad University. Mashhad. Iran
Psicológica (Valencia, Ed. impr.) ; 38(1): 93-109, 2017. tab, graf
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-161214
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
ABSTRACT
In large scale multiple-choice (MC) tests alternate forms of a test may be developed to prevent cheating by changing the order of items or by changing the position of the response options. The assumption is that since the content of the test forms are the same the order of items or the positions of the response options do not have any effect on item difficulty and other psychometric characteristics of the test. The purpose of the present investigation is to model the difficulty of the options’ positions (a, b, c, and d) in a high-stakes MC test using the linear logistic test model (Fischer, 1973). Findings revealed that options’ positions have very slight differences in difficulty and as the position of the correct option moves toward the end of the set of response options it becomes slightly more difficult (AU)
RESUMEN
No disponible
Subject(s)
Full text: 1 Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Psychometrics / Psychotherapy / Students Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Psicológica (Valencia, Ed. impr.) Year: 2017 Document type: Article
Full text: 1 Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Psychometrics / Psychotherapy / Students Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Psicológica (Valencia, Ed. impr.) Year: 2017 Document type: Article