Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.
Meco, Massimo; Montisci, Andrea; Miceli, Antonio; Panisi, Paolo; Donatelli, Francesco; Cirri, Silvia; Ferrarini, Matteo; Lio, Antonio; Glauber, Mattia.
Affiliation
  • Meco M; Cardiothoracic Department, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Gruppo Ospedaliero San Donato, Milan, Italy.
  • Montisci A; Cardiothoracic Department, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Gruppo Ospedaliero San Donato, Milan, Italy montisci.andrea@yahoo.it.
  • Miceli A; Cardiothoracic Department, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Gruppo Ospedaliero San Donato, Milan, Italy.
  • Panisi P; Cardiac Centre, Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
  • Donatelli F; Cardiothoracic Department, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Gruppo Ospedaliero San Donato, Milan, Italy.
  • Cirri S; Chair of Cardiac Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Ferrarini M; Cardiothoracic Department, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Gruppo Ospedaliero San Donato, Milan, Italy.
  • Lio A; Cardiothoracic Department, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Gruppo Ospedaliero San Donato, Milan, Italy.
  • Glauber M; Cardiothoracic Department, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Gruppo Ospedaliero San Donato, Milan, Italy.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 7(4)2018 02 16.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29453309
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular disease and has a dismal prognosis without surgical treatment. The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantitatively assess the comparative effectiveness of the Perceval (LivaNova) valve versus conventional aortic bioprostheses. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

A total of 6 comparative studies were identified, including 639 and 760 patients who underwent, respectively, aortic valve replacement with the Perceval sutureless valve (P group) and with a conventional bioprosthesis (C group). Aortic cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass duration were significantly lower in the P group. No difference in postoperative mortality was shown for the P and C groups (2.8% versus 2.7%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-1.88]; P=0.98). Incidence of postoperative renal failure was lower in the P group compared with the C group (2.7% versus 5.5%; OR 0.45 [95% CI, 0.25-0.80]; P=0.007). Incidence of stroke (2.3% versus 1.7%; OR 1.34 [95% CI, 0.56-3.21]; P=0.51) and paravalvular leak (3.1% versus 1.6%; OR 2.52 [95% CI, 0.60-1.06]; P=0.21) was similar, whereas P group patients received fewer blood transfusions than C group patients (1.16±1.2 versus 2.13±2.2; mean difference 0.99 [95% CI, -1.22 to -0.75]; P=0.001). The incidence of pacemaker implantation was higher in the P than the C group (7.9% versus 3.1%; OR 2.45 [95% CI, 1.44-4.17]; P=0.001), whereas hemodynamic Perceval performance was better (transvalvular gradient 23.42±1.73 versus 22.8±1.86; mean difference 0.90 [95% CI, 0.62-1.18]; P=0.001), even during follow-up (10.98±5.7 versus 13.06±6.2; mean difference -2.08 [95% CI, -3.96 to -0.21]; P=0.030). We found no difference in 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:

The Perceval bioprosthesis improves the postoperative course compared with conventional bioprostheses and is an option for high-risk patients.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Valve / Aortic Valve Stenosis / Bioprosthesis / Heart Valve Prosthesis / Stents / Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / Sutureless Surgical Procedures Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Valve / Aortic Valve Stenosis / Bioprosthesis / Heart Valve Prosthesis / Stents / Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / Sutureless Surgical Procedures Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: