Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of sucralfate against hydrochloric acid-induced dental erosion.
Turssi, Cecilia P; Amaral, Flávia L B; França, Fabiana M G; Basting, Roberta T; Hara, Anderson T.
Affiliation
  • Turssi CP; Divisão de Cariologia e Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil. cecilia.turssi@slmandic.edu.br.
  • Amaral FLB; Instituto e Centro de Pesquisas Odontológicas São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua José Rocha Junqueira, 13, Campinas, SP, CEP 13045-755, Brazil. cecilia.turssi@slmandic.edu.br.
  • França FMG; Divisão de Cariologia e Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
  • Basting RT; Divisão de Cariologia e Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
  • Hara AT; Divisão de Cariologia e Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig ; 23(5): 2365-2370, 2019 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30302612
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Devising effective measures for the prevention of hydrochloric acid (HCl)-induced erosion is of great significance. This is even more important in dentine, in which products have limited diffusion. Therefore, agents that can bind to proteins forming an acid-resistant gel-like coat, such as sucralfate, may stand out as a promising alternative. This study investigated the protective effect of sucralfate suspensions against HCl-induced dental erosion. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In the first experiment, hydroxyapatite (HAp) crystals were pre-treated with a commercial sucralfate suspension (CoSS, pH 5.9), a stannous-containing sodium fluoride solution (NaF/SnCl2 pH 4.5), two prepared sucralfate suspensions (PrSS, pH 5.9 and 4.5), or deionized water (DI, control). HAp dissolution was measured using a pH-stat system. In a subsequent experiment, embedded/polished enamel and root dentine slabs were allocated into five groups to be treated with one of the tested substances prior to and during erosion-remineralization cycles (HCl-2 min + artificial saliva 60 min, two times per day, 5 days). Surface loss was assessed profilometrically. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's tests.

RESULTS:

HAp dissolution was as follows NaF/SnCl2 < CoSS < PrSS/pH 4.5, while PrSS/pH 5.9 = DI and both did not differ from CoSS and PrSS/pH 4.5. In enamel, surface loss did not differ between CoSS and PrSS/pH 4.5, with both having lower surface loss than PrSS/pH 5.9 and DI and NaF/SnCl2 differing only from DI. In root dentine, surface loss was as follows CoSS < PrSS/pH 5.9 < (NaF/SnCl2 = DI), while PrSS/pH 4.5 = CoSS = PrSS/pH 5.9.

CONCLUSION:

Sucralfate suspension provided anti-erosive protection to HCl-induced erosion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Sucralfate may protect teeth against erosion caused by gastric acid.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tooth Erosion / Sucralfate / Hydrochloric Acid Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tooth Erosion / Sucralfate / Hydrochloric Acid Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...