Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nasal endoscopy, room filtration, and aerosol concentrations during live outpatient encounters: a prospective, case-control study.
Gill, Amarbir S; Kaur, Kamaljeet; Shipman, Paige; Sumsion, Jorgen; Error, Marc; Kelly, Kerry; Alt, Jeremiah A.
Affiliation
  • Gill AS; Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Program, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Kaur K; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Shipman P; Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Program, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Sumsion J; School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Error M; Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Program, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Kelly K; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Alt JA; Utah Center for Nanomedicine, Nano Institute of Utah, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 12(1): 71-82, 2022 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34355871
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted safety concerns surrounding possible aerosol-generating procedures, but comparative data on the smallest particles capable of transmitting this virus remain limited. We evaluated the effect of nasal endoscopy on aerosol concentration and the role of a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter in reducing aerosol concentration. METHODS: Otolaryngology patients were prospectively enrolled in an outpatient, cross-sectional study. Demographic information and clinic room characteristics were recorded. A scanning mobility particle sizer and GRIMM aerosol monitor measured aerosols 14.3 nm to 34 µm in diameter (i.e., particles smaller than those currently examined in the literature) during (1) nasal endoscopy (± debridement) and (2) no nasal endoscopy encounters. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test were performed to compare aerosol concentrations and impact of HEPA filtration. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients met inclusion criteria (25 nasal endoscopy without debridement; 18 nasal endoscopy with debridement; 19 no nasal endoscopy). There was no significant difference in age or gender across cohorts. Aerosol concentration in the nasal endoscopy cohort (± debridement) was not greater than the no nasal endoscopy cohort (p = 0.36; confidence interval [95% CI], -1.76 to 0.17 µg/m3 ; and p = 0.12; 95% CI, -0.11 to 2.14 µg/m3 , respectively). Aerosol concentrations returned to baseline after 8.76 min without a HEPA filter versus 4.75 min with a HEPA filter (p = 0.001; 95% CI, 1.73-6.3 min). CONCLUSION: Using advanced instrumentation and a comparative study design, aerosol concentration was shown to be no greater during nasal endoscopy versus no endoscopy encounters. HEPA filter utilization reduced aerosol concentrations significantly faster than no HEPA filter.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Outpatients / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Outpatients / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: