Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Intravenous Fluid Treatment With a Balanced Solution vs 0.9% Saline Solution on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The BaSICS Randomized Clinical Trial.
Zampieri, Fernando G; Machado, Flávia R; Biondi, Rodrigo S; Freitas, Flávio G R; Veiga, Viviane C; Figueiredo, Rodrigo C; Lovato, Wilson J; Amêndola, Cristina P; Serpa-Neto, Ary; Paranhos, Jorge L R; Guedes, Marco A V; Lúcio, Eraldo A; Oliveira-Júnior, Lúcio C; Lisboa, Thiago C; Lacerda, Fábio H; Maia, Israel S; Grion, Cintia M C; Assunção, Murillo S C; Manoel, Airton L O; Silva-Junior, João M; Duarte, Péricles; Soares, Rafael M; Miranda, Tamiris A; de Lima, Lucas M; Gurgel, Rodrigo M; Paisani, Denise M; Corrêa, Thiago D; Azevedo, Luciano C P; Kellum, John A; Damiani, Lucas P; Brandão da Silva, Nilton; Cavalcanti, Alexandre B.
Affiliation
  • Zampieri FG; HCor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Machado FR; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Biondi RS; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Freitas FGR; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Intensive Care, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Veiga VC; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Figueiredo RC; Instituto de Cardiologia do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil.
  • Lovato WJ; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Amêndola CP; Hospital SEPACO, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Serpa-Neto A; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Paranhos JLR; BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Guedes MAV; Hospital Maternidade São José, Centro Universitário do Espírito Santo, Colatina, Brazil.
  • Lúcio EA; Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
  • Oliveira-Júnior LC; Fundação Pio XII, Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, Brazil.
  • Lisboa TC; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Lacerda FH; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Maia IS; Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São João Del Rei, São João Del Rei, Brazil.
  • Grion CMC; Hospital Ana Nery, Salvador, Brazil.
  • Assunção MSC; Hospital São Francisco, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Manoel ALO; Hospital Geral Clériston Andrade, Feira de Santana, Brazil.
  • Silva-Junior JM; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Duarte P; Hospital Santa Rita, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Soares RM; Hospital da Luz, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Miranda TA; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Lima LM; Hospital Nereu Ramos, Florianópolis, Brazil.
  • Gurgel RM; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Paisani DM; Hospital Universitário Regional do Norte do Paraná, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.
  • Corrêa TD; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Azevedo LCP; Hospital Paulistano, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Kellum JA; Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Damiani LP; Hospital Universitário de Cascavel, Cascavel, Brazil.
  • Brandão da Silva N; HCor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Cavalcanti AB; HCor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
JAMA ; 2021 Aug 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34375394
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE Intravenous fluids are used for almost all intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Clinical and laboratory studies have questioned whether specific fluid types result in improved outcomes, including mortality and acute kidney injury.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the effect of a balanced solution vs saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) on 90-day survival in critically ill patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS:

Double-blind, factorial, randomized clinical trial conducted at 75 ICUs in Brazil. Patients who were admitted to the ICU with at least 1 risk factor for worse outcomes, who required at least 1 fluid expansion, and who were expected to remain in the ICU for more than 24 hours were randomized between May 29, 2017, and March 2, 2020; follow-up concluded on October 29, 2020. Patients were randomized to 2 different fluid types (a balanced solution vs saline solution reported in this article) and 2 different infusion rates (reported separately).

INTERVENTIONS:

Patients were randomly assigned 11 to receive either a balanced solution (n = 5522) or 0.9% saline solution (n = 5530) for all intravenous fluids. MAIN OUTCOMES AND

MEASURES:

The primary outcome was 90-day survival.

RESULTS:

Among 11 052 patients who were randomized, 10 520 (95.2%) were available for the analysis (mean age, 61.1 [SD, 17] years; 44.2% were women). There was no significant interaction between the 2 interventions (fluid type and infusion speed; P = .98). Planned surgical admissions represented 48.4% of all patients. Of all the patients, 60.6% had hypotension or vasopressor use and 44.3% required mechanical ventilation at enrollment. Patients in both groups received a median of 1.5 L of fluid during the first day after enrollment. By day 90, 1381 of 5230 patients (26.4%) assigned to a balanced solution died vs 1439 of 5290 patients (27.2%) assigned to saline solution (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.90-1.05]; P = .47). There were no unexpected treatment-related severe adverse events in either group. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Among critically ill patients requiring fluid challenges, use of a balanced solution compared with 0.9% saline solution did not significantly reduce 90-day mortality. The findings do not support the use of this balanced solution. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02875873.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: JAMA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: JAMA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: