Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Role of supplemental regional blocks on postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction after major non-cardiac surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Singh, Narinder P; Makkar, Jeetinder Kaur; Borle, Anuradha; Singh, Preet Mohinder.
Affiliation
  • Singh NP; Department of Anesthesiology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Ambala, Haryana, India.
  • Makkar JK; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India jeet1516@gmail.com.
  • Borle A; Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Singh PM; Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 2022 Dec 19.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36535728
BACKGROUND/IMPORTANCE: Postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction (PNCD) is a frequent and preventable complication after surgery. The large high-quality evidence for the efficacy of supplemental regional analgesia blocks (RAB) for preventing PNCD is still elusive. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of RAB versus standard anesthesia care on the incidence of PNCD in adult patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. EVIDENCE REVIEW: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Registers of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 2017 until June 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of PNCD within 1 month of surgery. A random-effects model with an inverse variance method was used to pool results, and OR and mean differences were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes. Various exploratory subgroup analyses were performed to explore the possibility of the association between the various patient, technique, and surgery-related factors. Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation guidelines were used to determine the certainty of evidence. FINDINGS: Twenty-six RCTs comprizing 4414 patients were included. The RAB group was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of PNCD with an OR of 0.46 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.59; p<0.00001; I2=28%) compared with the control group (moderate certainty). Subgroup analysis exhibited that the prophylactic efficacy of RAB persisted for both delirium and delayed neurocognitive recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that supplemental RAB are beneficial in preventing PNCD in patients after major non-cardiac surgery. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022338820.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Journal subject: ANESTESIOLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Journal subject: ANESTESIOLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: