Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Review of emerging trends and projection of future developments in large language models research in ophthalmology.
Wong, Matthew; Lim, Zhi Wei; Pushpanathan, Krithi; Cheung, Carol Y; Wang, Ya Xing; Chen, David; Tham, Yih Chung.
Affiliation
  • Wong M; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Lim ZW; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Pushpanathan K; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Cheung CY; Centre for Innovation and Precision Eye Health & Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Wang YX; Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Chen D; Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital University of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
  • Tham YC; Centre for Innovation and Precision Eye Health & Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 108(10): 1362-1370, 2024 Sep 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38164563
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Large language models (LLMs) are fast emerging as potent tools in healthcare, including ophthalmology. This systematic review offers a twofold contribution it summarises current trends in ophthalmology-related LLM research and projects future directions for this burgeoning field.

METHODS:

We systematically searched across various databases (PubMed, Europe PMC, Scopus and Web of Science) for articles related to LLM use in ophthalmology, published between 1 January 2022 and 31 July 2023. Selected articles were summarised, and categorised by type (editorial, commentary, original research, etc) and their research focus (eg, evaluating ChatGPT's performance in ophthalmology examinations or clinical tasks).

FINDINGS:

We identified 32 articles meeting our criteria, published between January and July 2023, with a peak in June (n=12). Most were original research evaluating LLMs' proficiency in clinically related tasks (n=9). Studies demonstrated that ChatGPT-4.0 outperformed its predecessor, ChatGPT-3.5, in ophthalmology exams. Furthermore, ChatGPT excelled in constructing discharge notes (n=2), evaluating diagnoses (n=2) and answering general medical queries (n=6). However, it struggled with generating scientific articles or abstracts (n=3) and answering specific subdomain questions, especially those regarding specific treatment options (n=2). ChatGPT's performance relative to other LLMs (Google's Bard, Microsoft's Bing) varied by study design. Ethical concerns such as data hallucination (n=27), authorship (n=5) and data privacy (n=2) were frequently cited.

INTERPRETATION:

While LLMs hold transformative potential for healthcare and ophthalmology, concerns over accountability, accuracy and data security remain. Future research should focus on application programming interface integration, comparative assessments of popular LLMs, their ability to interpret image-based data and the establishment of standardised evaluation frameworks.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmology Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Ethics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Br J Ophthalmol / Br. j. ophthalmol / British journal of ophthalmology Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmology Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Ethics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Br J Ophthalmol / Br. j. ophthalmol / British journal of ophthalmology Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: