Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recreating the village: the patient experience with a hybrid model of Group Perinatal Care (GPPC) in an academic family health team.
Biringer, Anne; Morson, Natalie; Walji, Sakina; Tregaskiss, Natalie; Merritt, Susannah; Makuwaza, Tutsirai; Forte, Milena.
Affiliation
  • Biringer A; Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, 60 Murray Street, Box 25, Toronto, ON, M5T 3L9, Canada. Anne.Biringer@sinaihealth.ca.
  • Morson N; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Anne.Biringer@sinaihealth.ca.
  • Walji S; Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, 60 Murray Street, Box 25, Toronto, ON, M5T 3L9, Canada.
  • Tregaskiss N; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Merritt S; Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, 60 Murray Street, Box 25, Toronto, ON, M5T 3L9, Canada.
  • Makuwaza T; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Forte M; Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, 60 Murray Street, Box 25, Toronto, ON, M5T 3L9, Canada.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 227, 2024 Apr 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566095
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Group prenatal care (GPC) has been shown to have a positive impact on social support, patient knowledge and preparedness for birth. We developed an interprofessional hybrid model of care whereby the group perinatal care (GPPC) component was co-facilitated by midwives (MW) and family medicine residents (FMR) and alternating individual visits were provided by family physicians (FP's) within our academic family health team (FHT) In this qualitative study, we sought to explore the impact of this program and how it supports patients through pregnancy and the early newborn period.

METHODS:

Qualitative study that was conducted using semi-structured telephone interviews with 18 participants who had completed GPPC in the Mount Sinai Academic Family Health Team in Toronto, Canada and delivered between November 2016 and October 2018. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted by team members using grounded theory.

RESULTS:

Four over-arching themes emerged from the data (i) Participants highly valued information they received from multiple trusted sources, (ii) Participants felt well cared for by the collaborative and coordinated interprofessional team, (iii) The design of GPPC enabled a shared experience, allowing for increased support of the pregnant person, and (iv) GPPC facilitated a supportive transition into the community which positively impacted participants' emotional well- being.

CONCLUSIONS:

The four constructs of social support (emotional, informational, instrumental and appraisal) were central to the value that participants found in GPPC. This support from the team of healthcare providers, peers and partners had a positive impact on participants' mental health and helped them face the challenges of their transition to parenthood.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Family Health / Perinatal Care Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Journal subject: OBSTETRICIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Publication country: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Family Health / Perinatal Care Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Journal subject: OBSTETRICIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Publication country: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM