Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prioritization criteria in policies and management of human resources for health: a proposal for a validated methodology.
de Oliveira, Ana Paula Cavalcante; Mion, Ana Beatriz Zanardo; Batista, Helen Fernanda Barbosa; Galante, Mariana Lopes; Duré, María Isabel; Craveiro, Isabel; Mishima, Silvana Martins; Padilla, Mónica; Laus, Ana Maria; Ventura, Carla Aparecida Arena.
Affiliation
  • de Oliveira APC; Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
  • Mion ABZ; Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
  • Batista HFB; Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Galante ML; Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
  • Duré MI; Pan American Health Organization Buenos Aires Argentina Pan American Health Organization, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Craveiro I; Global Health and Tropical Medicine Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical Universidade Nova de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Mishima SM; Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
  • Padilla M; Pan American Health Organization Brasilia Brazil Pan American Health Organization, Brasilia, Brazil.
  • Laus AM; Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
  • Ventura CAA; Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 48: e39, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38707776
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To create and validate criteria for prioritizing problems related to policies and management of the health workforce.

Methods:

This methodological study was divided into three stages. First, the criteria were elaborated by means of a systematized literature review. Second, the criteria were evaluated online by a committee of judges comprised of eight specialists. In the third stage, an evaluation was carried out by the target audience in a hybrid workshop. The participants evaluated the material using the Suitability Assessment of Materials instrument, adapted for the research.

Results:

Three prioritization criteria (relevance, window of opportunity and acceptability) and a scoring scale were developed based on the literature review. In the evaluation by the committee of judges, the approval percentage of the criteria and prioritization method was 84%. Modifications were made based on suggestions in relation to the material presented to the specialists. In the pre-test stage, the approval percentage varied by item, with six of them reaching a maximum approval of 100% (corresponding to approximately 46% of the items), four reaching 92% and three achieving 83% each, indicating positive results.

Conclusions:

The developed criteria were considered valid for use in the context of policies and management in the area of human resources for health.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Rev Panam Salud Publica Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Rev Panam Salud Publica Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: