Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Non-invasive prenatal screening: Testing motivations and decision making in the low-risk population.
Lea, Jenna K; Stevens, Blair K; Mulligan, Shannon; Hashmi, Syed S; Lunstroth, Rebecca; Choates, Meagan G.
Affiliation
  • Lea JK; UT MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Stevens BK; Department of Neurology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Mulligan S; UT MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Hashmi SS; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Lunstroth R; UT MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Choates MG; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Genet Couns ; 2024 May 23.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778790
ABSTRACT
Non-invasive prenatal screening provides a risk assessment for aneuploidies by utilizing cell-free DNA (cfDNA). It is recommended that cell-free DNA screening (cfDNA screening) be offered to all pregnant people regardless of a priori risk for aneuploidy. In the absence of an increased risk, alternative motives for electing cfDNA screening and different levels of informed decision making may arise. Therefore, our study aimed to characterize low-risk patients' motivations for cfDNA screening election, determine how often informed decisions are being made, and compare motivations between informed and uninformed decision makers. A survey that included a modified, validated measure of informed choice (MMIC) and questions to assess patients' motivations for cfDNA screening was offered at four MFM clinics following genetic counseling. It was found that 44% of participants (n = 100) made an uninformed decision about testing. Participants with private insurers were 4.25 times more likely to make an informed decision (95% CI = 1.10-16.37). Informed decision makers scored avoiding invasive procedures higher (p = 0.007) and ranked doing what family/friends desire lower (p = 0.005) than uninformed decision makers. While most participants scored receiving information about genetic conditions highest, 12% of participants reported fetal sex disclosure as a priority. However, this was not found to be associated with uninformed decision making. This study ultimately established that following genetic counseling, a low-risk population shared motivations with high-risk populations which highlights the importance of complete pre-test counseling for all. Future research should investigate the effect of modifying variables, such as socioeconomic status, on the performance of informed choice measures and critically evaluate the parameters that determine informed choice.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Genet Couns Journal subject: GENETICA MEDICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Genet Couns Journal subject: GENETICA MEDICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: