Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Healthcare resource utilization among nursing home residents with Parkinson's disease psychosis: an analysis of Medicare beneficiaries treated with pimavanserin or other-atypical antipsychotics.
Rajagopalan, Krithika; Rashid, Nazia; Gopal, Daksha; Doshi, Dilesh.
Affiliation
  • Rajagopalan K; Anlitiks Inc., Windermere, FL USA.
  • Rashid N; Medical Affairs, Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Diego, CA USA.
  • Gopal D; Anlitiks Inc., Windermere, FL USA.
  • Doshi D; Medical Affairs, Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Diego, CA USA.
J Comp Eff Res ; 13(7): e240038, 2024 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850129
ABSTRACT

Aim:

Real-world healthcare resource use (HCRU) burden among patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP) treated with pimavanserin (PIM) versus other atypical antipsychotics (other-AAPs) including quetiapine (QUE) in long term care (LTC) and nursing home (NH) settings are lacking. This analysis examines HCRU differences among residents in LTC/NH settings who initiate PIM versus QUE or other-AAPs.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis of LTC/NH residents with PDP from the 100% Medicare claims between 1 April 2015 and 31 December 2021 was conducted. Treatment-naive residents who initiated ≥6 months continuous monotherapy with PIM or QUE or other-AAPs between 04/01/16 and 06/30/2021 were propensity score matched (PSM) 11 using 31 variables (age, sex, race, region and 27 Elixhauser comorbidity characteristics). Post-index (i.e., 6 months) HCRU outcomes included proportion of residents with ≥1 all-cause inpatient (IP) hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits. HCRU differences were assessed via log binomial regression and reported as relative risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals after controlling for dementia, insomnia and index year.

Results:

From a total of PIM (n = 1827), QUE (n = 7770) or other-AAPs (n = 9557), 11 matched sample (n = 1827) in each cohort were selected. All-cause IP hospitalizations (PIM [29.8%]) versus QUE [36.7%]) and ER visits (PIM [47.3%] versus QUE [55.8%]), respectively, were significantly lower for PIM. PIM versus QUE cohort also had significantly lower RR for all-cause IP hospitalizations and ER visits, respectively, (IP hospitalizations RR 0.82 [0.75. 0.9]; ER visits RR 0.85 [0.8. 0.9]). PIM versus other-AAPs also had lower likelihood of HCRU outcomes.

Conclusion:

In this analysis, LTC/NH residents on PIM monotherapy (versus QUE) had a lower likelihood of all-cause hospitalizations (18%) and ER (15%) visits. In this setting, PIM also had lower likelihood of all-cause HCRU versus other-AAPs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Parkinson Disease / Piperidines / Psychotic Disorders / Antipsychotic Agents / Urea / Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Medicare / Nursing Homes Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Comp Eff Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Parkinson Disease / Piperidines / Psychotic Disorders / Antipsychotic Agents / Urea / Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Medicare / Nursing Homes Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Comp Eff Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: