Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors influencing imaging clinical decision-making in low back pain management. A scoping review.
Tanner, Luke; Saywell, Nicola L; Adams, Thomas; Niazi, Imran Khan; Hill, Julia.
Affiliation
  • Tanner L; Clinical Physiotherapist, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Saywell NL; Physiotherapy Department, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Adams T; Research Innovation Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Niazi IK; Physiotherapy Department, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Hill J; Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Musculoskeletal Care ; 22(2): e1898, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38862275
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The use of diagnostic imaging in low back pain (LBP) management is often inappropriate, despite recommendations from clinical practice guidelines. There is a limited understanding of factors that influence the imaging clinical decision-making (CDM) process.

AIM:

Explore the literature on factors influencing imaging CDM for people with LBP and consider how these findings could be used to reduce inappropriate use of imaging in LBP management.

DESIGN:

Scoping review.

METHOD:

This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review extension for scoping reviews. A digital search was conducted in Medline, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for eligible studies published between January 2010-2023. Data reporting influences on imaging CDM were extracted. Data were then analysed through an inductive process to group the influencing factors into categories.

RESULTS:

After screening, 35 studies (5 qualitative and 30 quantitative) were included in the review, which reported factors influencing imaging CDM. Three categories were developed clinical features (such as red flags, pain, and neurological deficit), non-modifiable factors (such as age, sex, and ethnicity) and modifiable factors (such as beliefs about consequences and clinical practice). Most studies reported non-modifiable factors.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this scoping review challenge the perception that imaging CDM is purely based on clinical history and objective findings. There is a complex interplay between clinical features, patient and clinician characteristics, beliefs, and environment. These findings should be considered when designing strategies to address inappropriate imaging behaviour.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Low Back Pain / Clinical Decision-Making Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Musculoskeletal Care Journal subject: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Low Back Pain / Clinical Decision-Making Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Musculoskeletal Care Journal subject: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: