Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Associations Between Life's Essential 8 and Insulin Resistance Among Nondiabetic Adults.
Pang, Shuo; Wang, Yue; Sun, Shuaifeng; Wang, Shen; Li, Fadong; Zhao, Wenxin; Wu, Xiaofan.
Affiliation
  • Pang S; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.
  • Sun S; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.
  • Wang S; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.
  • Li F; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.
  • Zhao W; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.
  • Wu X; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(13): e033997, 2024 Jul 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904231
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Insulin resistance (IR) is closely linked to cardiometabolic diseases. Preventing and improving IR in nondiabetic populations is critically important. We aimed to investigate the relationship between Life's Essential 8 (LE8), the latest tool from the American Heart Association quantifying cardiovascular health, and IR among nondiabetic populations in the United States. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

This cross-sectional study used data on 11 246 nondiabetic adults aged ≥20 years from the 2005 to 2018 the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The LE8 score was classified into 2 subscale scores health factor score and health behavior score. IR was measured by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Weighted logistic and linear regression models analyzed associations among the LE8 score, health behavior score, health factor score, and IR. Restricted cubic spline models assessed dose-response relationships. Adjusted subgroup analyses and inverse probability of treatment weighting method also evaluated the LE8-IR relationship. Of the 11 246 participants, 4860 (43.2%) had IR. The mean LE8 score was 70.07 (95% CI, 69.57-70.58). In fully adjusted models, higher LE8 scores were associated with lower IR odds (odds ratio per 10-unit increase, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.54-0.61]). Nonlinear LE8-IR dose-response was observed. Similar patterns were seen for health behavior and health factor subscores, with stronger IR correlations for health factors. The inverse LE8-IR association was significantly more pronounced among White participants and those with higher education, higher income, and without hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or chronic kidney disease. Significant negative LE8-IR associations persisted after inverse probability of treatment weighting.

CONCLUSIONS:

LE8 and subscale scores are negatively associated with IR in a nonlinear relationship. Promoting optimal cardiovascular health adherence may improve IR in nondiabetic populations.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Insulin Resistance / Nutrition Surveys Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Insulin Resistance / Nutrition Surveys Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: