Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the Size Measurement of Gallbladder Polyps by Three Different Radiologists in Abdominal Ultrasonography.
Lee, Kyu-Chong; Kim, Jin-Kyem; Kim, Dong-Kyu.
Affiliation
  • Lee KC; Department of Radiology, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam 13574, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JK; Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73 Geryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim DK; Department of Radiology, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam 13574, Republic of Korea.
Tomography ; 10(7): 1031-1041, 2024 Jul 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39058049
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is little information regarding the size measurement differences in gallbladder (GB) polyps performed by different radiologists on abdominal ultrasonography (US).

AIM:

To reveal the differences in GB polyp size measurements performed by different radiologists on abdominal US.

METHODS:

From June to September 2022, the maximum diameter of 228 GB polyps was measured twice on abdominal US by one of three radiologists (a third-year radiology resident [reader A], a radiologist with 7 years of experience in abdominal US [reader B], and an abdominal radiologist with 8 years of experience in abdominal US [reader C]). Intra-reader agreements for polyp size measurements were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Bland-Altman plot was used to visualize the differences between the first and second size measurements in each reader.

RESULTS:

Reader A, reader B, and reader C evaluated 65, 77, and 86 polyps, respectively. The mean size of measured 228 GB polyps was 5.0 ± 1.9 mm. Except for the case where reader A showed moderate intra-reader agreement (0.726) for polyps with size ≤ 5 mm, all readers showed an overall high intra-reader reliability (reader A, ICC = 0.859; reader B, ICC = 0.947, reader C, ICC = 0.948), indicative of good and excellent intra-reader agreements. The 95% limit of agreement of reader A, B, and C was 1.9 mm of the mean in all three readers.

CONCLUSIONS:

GB polyp size measurement on abdominal US showed good or excellent intra-reader agreements. However, size changes of approximately less than 1.9 mm should be interpreted carefully because these may be within the measurement error.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polyps / Ultrasonography / Radiologists Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Tomography Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polyps / Ultrasonography / Radiologists Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Tomography Year: 2024 Document type: Article