Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-Term Effectiveness and Reasons for Discontinuation of Dupilumab in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis.
Boesjes, Celeste M; Kamphuis, Esmé; de Graaf, Marlies; Spekhorst, Lotte S; Haeck, Inge; van der Gang, Lian F; Loman, Laura; Zuithoff, Nicolaas P A; Dekkers, Coco; van der Rijst, Lisa P; Romeijn, Geertruida L E; Oosting, Albert J; Gostynksi, Antoni; van Lynden-van Nes, Anneke M T; Tupker, Ron A; van Tuyll van Serooskerken, Anne-Moon; Flinterman, Annebeth; Politiek, Klaziena; Touwslager, Wouter R H; Christoffers, Wianda A; Stewart, Shiarra M; Kamsteeg, Marijke; Schuttelaar, Marie-Louise A; de Bruin-Weller, Marjolein S.
Affiliation
  • Boesjes CM; National Expertise Center for Atopic Dermatitis, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Kamphuis E; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • de Graaf M; National Expertise Center for Atopic Dermatitis, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Spekhorst LS; National Expertise Center for Atopic Dermatitis, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Haeck I; Department of Dermatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • van der Gang LF; National Expertise Center for Atopic Dermatitis, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Loman L; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Zuithoff NPA; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Dekkers C; National Expertise Center for Atopic Dermatitis, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • van der Rijst LP; National Expertise Center for Atopic Dermatitis, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Romeijn GLE; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Oosting AJ; Department of Dermatology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
  • Gostynksi A; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • van Lynden-van Nes AMT; Department of Dermatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
  • Tupker RA; Department of Dermatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
  • van Tuyll van Serooskerken AM; Department of Dermatology, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
  • Flinterman A; Department of Dermatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Politiek K; Department of Dermatology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
  • Touwslager WRH; Department of Dermatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Christoffers WA; Department of Dermatology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
  • Stewart SM; Department of Dermatology, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands.
  • Kamsteeg M; Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Schuttelaar MA; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • de Bruin-Weller MS; National Expertise Center for Atopic Dermatitis, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
JAMA Dermatol ; 2024 Aug 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39110432
ABSTRACT
Importance Limited data are available on the long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice.

Objective:

To evaluate clinical effectiveness and reasons for discontinuation of dupilumab treatment in children, adults, and older adults with AD with up to 5 years of treatment in daily practice. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

This prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted using the BioDay registry (4 academic and 10 nonacademic hospitals in the Netherlands) to identify patients with AD of all ages who were treated with dupilumab between October 2017 and December 2022. Main Outcomes and

Measures:

Clinical effectiveness was evaluated by the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for pruritus, stratified by children (<18 years), adults (18-64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). In addition, time to response, treatment responders, EASI subscores, second treatment episodes, and thymus- and activation-related chemokine and eosinophil levels were assessed. For patients who discontinued dupilumab, the reason for discontinuation was evaluated.

Results:

In total, 1286 patients with AD (median [IQR] age, 38 [26-54] years; 726 [56.6%] male) were treated with dupilumab, including 130 children, 1025 adults, and 131 older adults. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 87.5 (32.0-157.0) weeks. Most patients maintained controlled AD, with EASI of 7 or lower and NRS for pruritus of 4 or lower varying between 78.6% and 92.3% and 72.2% and 88.2% for up to 5 years of treatment, respectively, while up to 70.5% of all patients prolonged the dosing interval to mostly 300 mg every 3 or 4 weeks. Mean EASI and NRS for pruritus were 2.7 (95% CI, 1.2-4.2) and 3.5 (95% CI, 2.7-4.3), respectively, after 5 years of treatment. Statistically significant differences between age groups were found over time for EASI and IGA; however, differences were rather small (week 52 EASI, 0.3-1.6; IGA, 0.12-0.26). No statistically significant differences between age groups were found for NRS for pruritus. Median thymus- and activation-related chemokine levels considerably decreased from 1751 pg/mL (95% CI, 1614-1900 pg/mL) to 390 pg/mL (95% CI, 368-413 pg/mL) after 6 months of treatment and remained low. Median eosinophil levels temporarily increased up to week 16, with a subsequently statistically significant decrease over time. In total, 306 patients (23.8%) discontinued dupilumab after a median (IQR) of 54.0 (29.0-110.00) weeks, with adverse events among 98 patients (7.6%) and ineffectiveness among 85 patients (6.6%) as the most frequently reported reasons. Forty-one patients (3.2%) restarted dupilumab, and most of these patients recaptured response. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study with up to 5 years of follow-up, dupilumab maintained its clinical effectiveness, while two-thirds of patients tapered to a dosing interval of every 3 or 4 weeks. Treatment was discontinued in 23.8% of patients mainly due to adverse events and/or ineffectiveness.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: JAMA Dermatol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: JAMA Dermatol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: