Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
SARS-CoV-2 screening prevalence in educational staff in Berlin, Germany, June-December 2020
Sophia Kindzierski; Welmoed van Loon; Johanna Theuring; Franziska Hommes; Eberhard Thombansen; Malik Boettcher; Harald Matthes; Heike Roessig; David Weiger; Christof Wiesmann; Tobias Kurth; Kirchberger Valerie; Joachim Seybold; Frank P Mockenhaupt; Maximilian Gertler.
Affiliation
  • Sophia Kindzierski; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
  • Welmoed van Loon; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
  • Johanna Theuring; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
  • Franziska Hommes; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
  • Eberhard Thombansen; Vivantes
  • Malik Boettcher; Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhoehe
  • Harald Matthes; Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhoehe
  • Heike Roessig; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
  • David Weiger; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
  • Christof Wiesmann; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
  • Tobias Kurth; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
  • Kirchberger Valerie; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
  • Joachim Seybold; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
  • Frank P Mockenhaupt; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
  • Maximilian Gertler; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
Preprint in En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-21257452
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 infections in childcare and school settings potentially bear occupational risks to educational staff. We analyzed data derived from voluntary, PCR-based screening of childcare educators and teachers attending five testing sites in Berlin, Germany, between June and December 2020. Within seven months, 17,491 tests were performed (4,458 educators, 13,033 teachers). Participants were largely female (72.9%), and median age was 41 years. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence was 1.2% (95%CI, 1.1-1.4%). Prevalence in educational staff largely resembled community incidence until the start of the second pandemic wave in mid-September 2020, when an unsteady prevalence plateau was reached. Then, infection prevalence in teachers (1.2% [95%CI, 0.8-1.8%]) did not significantly differ from the population prevalence (0.9% [0.6-1.4%]) but it was increased in educators (2.6% [1.6-4.0%]; aOR, 1.6 [1.3-2.0]). Irrespective of occupation, those that reported contact to a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 case outside of work had increased risk of infection (aOR, 3.0 [95%CI, 1.5-5.5]). In a step-wise backwards selection, the best set of associated factors with SARS-CoV-2 infection involved age, occupation, and calendar week. These results are in line with findings that teachers do not bear an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, while childcare educators do. Infection control and prevention measures need to be strengthened in child care settings to further reduce respective occupational hazards. At the same time, the private environment appears to be the main source of SARS-CoV-2 infection for educational staff.
License
cc_by_nc_nd
Full text: 1 Collection: 09-preprints Database: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Language: En Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
Full text: 1 Collection: 09-preprints Database: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Language: En Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint