Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ex vivo evaluation of PBMNCs collected with a new cell separator.
Snyder, E L; O'Donnell, L; Dengler, T J; Pomper, G J; Velleca, M A; Dincecco, D M; Baril, L L; Min, K; Gudino, M D; Bender, J R.
Affiliation
  • Snyder EL; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06504, USA. edward.snyder@yale.edu
Transfusion ; 41(7): 940-9, 2001 Jul.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11452164
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study reports on an evaluation of the ability of a cell separator (Amicus, Baxter Healthcare) and the integral MNC computer software program to collect a variety of MNC subsets. The collection efficiency (CE) of the Amicus for these MNC subsets was compared to that of another cell separator (CS-3000 Plus, Baxter). The collected MNCs were also assayed ex vivo to determine if these cells remained functional. STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

Healthy volunteer blood donors were recruited to provide PBMNCs for the isolation of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD19+, NK, and gammadelta+ cells and monocytes. Cells were collected with an Amicus (test arm; n = 16) or a CS-3000 Plus (control arm; n = 11) cell separator. Cells were counted on a flow cytometer and CEs were calculated. For functional studies, the Amicus-collected MNC data were compared to CS-3000 Plus historical data. Functional studies performed included surface antigen expression assays (CD8+), proliferation assays (CD4+ and CD8+ cells), NK cytotoxicity assays for K562 and HUVE cells, and E-selectin induction on endothelial cells through NK+ contact dependency. Dendritic cells (DCs) were generated from CD34+ cells collected on the Amicus, positively selected by the use of antibody-bound, magnetic bead technology, and then cultured ex vivo with a combination of growth factors to generate the DCs.

RESULTS:

CEs were higher on the Amicus than on the CS-3000 Plus for CD3+ (68 vs. 54%), CD4+ (70 vs. 56%), CD8+ (68 vs. 52%), and CD19+ (60 vs. 48%) cells (p<0.05). For the two separators, CEs were equivalent for monocytes, NK+, and gammadelta+ cells. The Amicus separator collected significantly fewer platelets than did the CS-3000 Plus (p<0.00001). CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells proliferated normally. NK cells appropriately stimulated E-selectin expression on endothelial cells. Culture-generated DCs obtained by using Amicus-collected CD34+ cells expressed appropriate cell surface markers.

CONCLUSION:

The Amicus separator is acceptable for the collection of PBMNC subsets. The device collects CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD19+ T- and B-cell subsets with greater efficiency and collects MNCs with significantly fewer contaminating platelets than does the CS-3000 Plus. Cells collected on the Amicus are suitable for use in a variety of research and clinical immunobiologic studies.
Sujet(s)
Recherche sur Google
Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Agranulocytes / Séparation cellulaire Type d'étude: Evaluation_studies Limites: Humans / Newborn Langue: En Journal: Transfusion Année: 2001 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique
Recherche sur Google
Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Agranulocytes / Séparation cellulaire Type d'étude: Evaluation_studies Limites: Humans / Newborn Langue: En Journal: Transfusion Année: 2001 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique