[Are chest radiographs justified in pre-employment examinations? Presentation of legal position and medical evidence based on 1760 cases]. / Ist die Röntgenthoraxaufnahme bei Neueinstellungen gerechtfertigt? Darstellung von Rechtslage und medizinischer Evidenz in 1760 Fällen.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The legal and medical basis for chest radiographs as part of pre-employment examinations (PEE) at a University Hospital is evaluated. The radiographs are primarily performed to exclude infectious lung disease. METHODS: A total of 1760 consecutive chest radiographs performed as a routine part of PEEs were reviewed retrospectively. Pathologic findings were categorized as "nonrelevant" or "relevant." RESULTS: No positive finding with respect to tuberculosis or any other infectious disease was found; 94.8% of the chest radiographs were completely normal. Only five findings were regarded as "relevant" for the individual. No employment-relevant diagnosis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of chest radiography as part of a PEE is most often not justified. The practice is expensive, can violate national and European law, and lacks medical justification.