Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is conservation triage just smart decision making?
Bottrill, Madeleine C; Joseph, Liana N; Carwardine, Josie; Bode, Michael; Cook, Carly; Game, Edward T; Grantham, Hedley; Kark, Salit; Linke, Simon; McDonald-Madden, Eve; Pressey, Robert L; Walker, Susan; Wilson, Kerrie A; Possingham, Hugh P.
Affiliation
  • Bottrill MC; The University of Queensland, The Applied Environmental Decision Analysis Centre, The Ecology Centre, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. m.bottrill@uq.edu.au
Trends Ecol Evol ; 23(12): 649-54, 2008 Dec.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18848367
ABSTRACT
Conservation efforts and emergency medicine face comparable problems how to use scarce resources wisely to conserve valuable assets. In both fields, the process of prioritising actions is known as triage. Although often used implicitly by conservation managers, scientists and policymakers, triage has been misinterpreted as the process of simply deciding which assets (e.g. species, habitats) will not receive investment. As a consequence, triage is sometimes associated with a defeatist conservation ethic. However, triage is no more than the efficient allocation of conservation resources and we risk wasting scarce resources if we do not follow its basic principles.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Conservation des ressources naturelles / Prise de décision Aspects: Ethics Limites: Animals Langue: En Journal: Trends Ecol Evol Année: 2008 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Australie

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Conservation des ressources naturelles / Prise de décision Aspects: Ethics Limites: Animals Langue: En Journal: Trends Ecol Evol Année: 2008 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Australie