Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
NASHA hyaluronic acid vs. methylprednisolone for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, non-inferiority trial.
Leighton, R; Akermark, C; Therrien, R; Richardson, J B; Andersson, M; Todman, M G; Arden, N K.
Affiliation
  • Leighton R; QEII Health Sciences Centre, New Halifax Infirmary, Halifax, NS, Canada. Electronic address: r.k.leighton@ns.sympatico.ca.
  • Akermark C; Sport Med, Birger Jarlsgatan 106A, SE-11420 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Therrien R; Centre de Rhumatologie St-Louis, Saint-Foy, Quebec, Canada G1W4R4.
  • Richardson JB; Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic & District Hospital, Institute of Orthopaedics Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK.
  • Andersson M; Q-Med AB, Seminariegatan 21, 752 28 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Todman MG; Smith & Nephew UK Ltd, Research Centre, York Science Park, York, UK.
  • Arden NK; NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, UK.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 22(1): 17-25, 2014 Jan.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24185114
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare NASHA hyaluronic acid gel as single-injection intra-articular (IA) treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA) against methylprednisolone acetate (MPA).

DESIGN:

This was a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. A unique, open-label extension phase (OLE) was undertaken to answer further important clinical questions. Subjects with painful unilateral knee OA were treated and followed for 26 weeks (blinded phase). All patients attending the clinic at 26 weeks were offered NASHA treatment, with a subsequent 26-week follow-up period (extension phase). The primary objective was to show non-inferiority of NASHA vs MPA in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain responder rate (percentage of patients with ≥40% improvement from baseline in WOMAC pain score and an absolute improvement of ≥5 points) at 12 weeks.

RESULTS:

In total, 442 participants were enrolled. The primary objective was met, with NASHA producing a non-inferior response rate vs MPA at 12 weeks (NASHA 44.6%; MPA 46.2%; difference [95% CI] 1.6% [-11.2%; +7.9%]). Effect size for WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness scores favoured NASHA over MPA from 12 to 26 weeks. In response to NASHA treatment at 26 weeks, sustained improvements were seen in WOMAC outcomes irrespective of initial treatment. No serious device-related adverse events (AEs) were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study shows that single-injection NASHA was well tolerated and non-inferior to MPA at 12 weeks. The benefit of NASHA was maintained to 26 weeks while that of MPA declined. An injection of NASHA at 26 weeks conferred long-term improvements without increased sensitivity or risk of complications. STUDY IDENTIFIER NCT01209364 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Méthylprednisolone / Gonarthrose / Glucocorticoïdes / Acide hyaluronique Type d'étude: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Sujet du journal: ORTOPEDIA / REUMATOLOGIA Année: 2014 Type de document: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Méthylprednisolone / Gonarthrose / Glucocorticoïdes / Acide hyaluronique Type d'étude: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Sujet du journal: ORTOPEDIA / REUMATOLOGIA Année: 2014 Type de document: Article