Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigation of the effects of preoperative hydration on the postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Yavuz, M Selçuk; Kazanci, Dilek; Turan, Sema; Aydinli, Bahar; Selçuk, Gökçe; Özgök, Aysegül; Cosar, Ahmet.
Affiliation
  • Yavuz MS; Duatepe Polatli State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kazanci D; Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Kizilay Street No. 4, Samanpazari Altindag, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Turan S; Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Kizilay Street No. 4, Samanpazari Altindag, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Aydinli B; Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Kizilay Street No. 4, Samanpazari Altindag, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Selçuk G; Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Kizilay Street No. 4, Samanpazari Altindag, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Özgök A; Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Kizilay Street No. 4, Samanpazari Altindag, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Cosar A; Gülhane Military Medicine Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Ankara, Turkey.
Biomed Res Int ; 2014: 302747, 2014.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24563861
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations still continue to be a serious problem. Intravenous fluid administration has been shown to reduce PONV. Some patients have higher risk for PONV described by APFEL score. In this study, our aim was to determine the effects of preoperative intravenous hydration on postoperative nausea and vomiting in high Apfel scored patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

This study is performed with 50 female patients who had APFEL score 3-4 after ethics committee approval and informed consent was taken from patients. The patients were divided into 2 groups group 1 (P1) propofol + preoperative hydration and group 2 (P2) propofol + no preoperative hydration.

RESULTS:

When the total nausea VAS scores of groups P1 and P2 to which hydration was given or not given were compared, a statistically significant difference was detected at 8th and 12th hours (P = 0.001 and P = 0.041). It was observed that in group P1, which was given hydration, the nausea VAS score was lower. When the total number of patients who had nausea and vomiting in P1 and P2, more patients suffered nausea in P2 group.

DISCUSSION:

Preoperative hydration may be effective in high Apfel scored patients to prevent postoperative nausea.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Soins préopératoires / Vomissements et nausées postopératoires / Traitement par apport liquidien Type d'étude: Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Ethics Limites: Female / Humans Langue: En Journal: Biomed Res Int Année: 2014 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Turquie

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Soins préopératoires / Vomissements et nausées postopératoires / Traitement par apport liquidien Type d'étude: Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Ethics Limites: Female / Humans Langue: En Journal: Biomed Res Int Année: 2014 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Turquie