A simulation comparing the cost-effectiveness of adult incontinence products.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs
; 41(5): 467-72, 2014.
Article
de En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-24949834
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To compare leak point volumes and cost-effectiveness of a variety of adult incontinence products.METHODS:
Adult incontinence products were purchased from local retail stores and categorized into moderate absorbency pads, moderate absorbency briefs, maximum absorbency pads, and maximum absorbent briefs. The leak point for each product was determined by applying fluid to the pad until the first drop of leakage from the pad or brief occurred. Cost-effectiveness was calculated by dividing the cost per product by the amount of fluid absorbed prior to the leak point. The leak points and cost-effectiveness of incontinence products were compared within and between categories.RESULTS:
Significant differences in leak point volumes were present within all product categories except moderate absorbency pads. When comparing product categories, moderate absorbency pads were the least cost-effective, followed by maximum absorbency pads and absorbent briefs (P < .01).CONCLUSIONS:
As a group, absorbent briefs are more cost-effective than incontinence pads, although products of similar absorbency category and design demonstrated varying leak points and cost-effectiveness. These findings may influence physician assessment of urinary incontinence as well as patient selection of incontinence products.
Texte intégral:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Base de données:
MEDLINE
Sujet principal:
Incontinence urinaire
/
Simulation sur patients standardisés
/
Couches pour incontinents
/
Analyse coût-bénéfice
/
Matériel jetable
/
Études de validation comme sujet
/
Incontinence anale
Type d'étude:
Health_economic_evaluation
Limites:
Humans
Langue:
En
Journal:
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs
Sujet du journal:
ENFERMAGEM
Année:
2014
Type de document:
Article