Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bone resorption in different parts of the mandible in patients restored with an implant overdenture. A retrospective radiographic analysis.
Kremer, Urs; Schindler, Sven; Enkling, Norbert; Worni, Andreas; Katsoulis, Joannis; Mericske-Stern, Regina.
Affiliation
  • Kremer U; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Schindler S; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Enkling N; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Worni A; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Katsoulis J; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Mericske-Stern R; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 27(3): 267-72, 2016 Mar.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25418368
ABSTRACT

AIM:

This study investigated the pattern of resorption of the mandibular ridge under implant-supported overdentures. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Files of 60 patients were available for analysis (45 women and 15 men, mean age at the time of the follow-up 76.5 ± 8.5 years, 54 patients restored with bars, 6 with ball anchors). A baseline was defined by different stable landmarks and quartered. Linear measurements from this baseline at different clinical relevant sites approximately at (i) the area close to the mental foramen/close to the implant, (ii) the chewing center, and (iii) the distal edge of the denture flange were carried out on rotational tomograms (OPTs). The OPTs were taken after prosthetic restoration and at an individual follow-up time (mean 11 ± 4.75 years). The known implant length served to scale each measurement to avoid any distortion errors.

RESULTS:

The resorption rate showed a high individual variation, but among the three sites, the difference was highly significant. Median values of site (i) left = -0.07 mm/right = +0.05 mm, site (ii) left = -0.60 mm/right = -0.55 mm, and site (iii) left = -1.58 mm/right = -2.01 mm.

CONCLUSIONS:

The load of the distal flange of a mandibular implant overdenture increases bone resorption as a local factor, whereas implants may help to prevent resorption in the neighboring bone. An individual-adapted follow-up protocol should be established for each patient restored with an implant overdenture.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Résorption osseuse / Résorption alvéolaire / Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée / Prothèse dentaire complète / Overdenture / Mandibule Type d'étude: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limites: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Sujet du journal: ODONTOLOGIA Année: 2016 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Suisse Pays de publication: DENMARK / DINAMARCA / DK

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Résorption osseuse / Résorption alvéolaire / Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée / Prothèse dentaire complète / Overdenture / Mandibule Type d'étude: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limites: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Sujet du journal: ODONTOLOGIA Année: 2016 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Suisse Pays de publication: DENMARK / DINAMARCA / DK