Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Temporal dynamics of linkage disequilibrium in two populations of bighorn sheep.
Miller, Joshua M; Poissant, Jocelyn; Malenfant, René M; Hogg, John T; Coltman, David W.
Affiliation
  • Miller JM; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Poissant J; Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter Penryn Campus, UK.
  • Malenfant RM; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Hogg JT; Montana Conservation Science Institute 5200 Upper Miller Creek Road, Missoula, Montana, USA.
  • Coltman DW; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ecol Evol ; 5(16): 3401-12, 2015 Aug.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26380673
ABSTRACT
Linkage disequilibrium (LD) is the nonrandom association of alleles at two markers. Patterns of LD have biological implications as well as practical ones when designing association studies or conservation programs aimed at identifying the genetic basis of fitness differences within and among populations. However, the temporal dynamics of LD in wild populations has received little empirical attention. In this study, we examined the overall extent of LD, the effect of sample size on the accuracy and precision of LD estimates, and the temporal dynamics of LD in two populations of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) with different demographic histories. Using over 200 microsatellite loci, we assessed two metrics of multi-allelic LD, D', and χ ('2). We found that both populations exhibited high levels of LD, although the extent was much shorter in a native population than one that was founded via translocation, experienced a prolonged bottleneck post founding, followed by recent admixture. In addition, we observed significant variation in LD in relation to the sample size used, with small sample sizes leading to depressed estimates of the extent of LD but inflated estimates of background levels of LD. In contrast, there was not much variation in LD among yearly cross-sections within either population once sample size was accounted for. Lack of pronounced interannual variability suggests that researchers may not have to worry about interannual variation when estimating LD in a population and can instead focus on obtaining the largest sample size possible.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies Langue: En Journal: Ecol Evol Année: 2015 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Canada

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies Langue: En Journal: Ecol Evol Année: 2015 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Canada