Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with virtual touch tissue quantification in the evaluation of focal liver lesions.
Wu, Jing-Ping; Shu, Rui; Zhao, Yu-Zhen; Ma, Guo-Lin; Xue, Wei; He, Qi-Jia; Hao, Mei-Na; Liu, Yawu.
Affiliation
  • Wu JP; Department of Ultrasonography, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Shu R; Department of Ultrasonography, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
  • Zhao YZ; Department of Ultrasonography, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Ma GL; Department of Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Xue W; Department of Ultrasonography, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • He QJ; Department of Ultrasonography, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Hao MN; Department of Ultrasonography, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Liu Y; Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 44(6): 347-53, 2016 Jul 08.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26890486
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), separately and in combination, in diagnosing malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs). METHODS: Forty-six patients with 55 FLLs (28 benign and 27 malignant) underwent both VTQ and CEUS. The diagnostic values of VTQ and CEUS, alone and in combination, were compared. RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of CEUS were 92.6% (25/27), 96.4% (27/28), 94.5% (52/55), 96.2% (25/26), and 93.1% (27/29), respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of VTQ with a cutoff of 2.22 m/s were 51.9% (14/27), 85.7% (24/28), 69.1% (38/55), 77.8% (14/18), and 64.9% (24/37), respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of VTQ and CEUS combined were 96.3% (26/27), 82.1% (23/28), 89.1% (49/55), 83.9% (26/31), and 95.8% (23/24), respectively. Comparing the accuracies of the three methods, the diagnostic values of CEUS and of the combination of CEUS with VTQ were significantly higher than those of VTQ alone (p ≤ 0.01). There was no significant difference between the combination of CEUS with VTQ and CEUS (p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: CEUS is superior to VTQ in diagnosing malignant FLLs. Adding VTQ to CEUS did not improve the diagnosis of FLLs. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 44:347-353, 2016.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Traitement d'image par ordinateur / Amélioration d'image / Échographie / Produits de contraste / Tumeurs du foie Type d'étude: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limites: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: J Clin Ultrasound Année: 2016 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Traitement d'image par ordinateur / Amélioration d'image / Échographie / Produits de contraste / Tumeurs du foie Type d'étude: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limites: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: J Clin Ultrasound Année: 2016 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique