Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benchmarking the value of ultrasound for acute appendicitis in children.
Cundy, Thomas P; Gent, Roger; Frauenfelder, Claire; Lukic, Laura; Linke, Rebecca J; Goh, Day Way.
Affiliation
  • Cundy TP; Department of Paediatric Surgery, Women's and Children's Hospital, South Australia; Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, South Australia. Electronic address: thomas.cundy@adelaide.edu.au.
  • Gent R; Department of Radiology, Women's and Children's Hospital, South Australia.
  • Frauenfelder C; Department of Paediatric Surgery, Women's and Children's Hospital, South Australia.
  • Lukic L; Department of Radiology, Women's and Children's Hospital, South Australia.
  • Linke RJ; Department of Radiology, Women's and Children's Hospital, South Australia.
  • Goh DW; Department of Paediatric Surgery, Women's and Children's Hospital, South Australia; Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia.
J Pediatr Surg ; 51(12): 1939-1943, 2016 Dec.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27670963
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study appraises the diagnostic quality of ultrasound for acute appendicitis in children and consequently challenges the perception of inferior accuracy and suitability compared to computed tomography (CT).

METHODS:

Radiologist reports for consecutive "query appendicitis" ultrasound studies were retrieved from a hospital database for the study period 2009-2014. Children who subsequently underwent appendicectomy were identified. Corresponding operative and histopathology findings were evaluated. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound was determined by analyzing overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictivity, and likelihood ratios.

RESULTS:

A total of 3799 ultrasound examinations were evaluated. Mean age was 11.5±3.8years. The proportion of patients investigated with preoperative ultrasound was 59.9% (1103/1840). Appendix visualization rate was 91.7%. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 95.5%. Sensitivity and specificity values were 97.1% (95.9-98.1; 95% CI) and 94.8% (93.9-95.6; 95% CI), respectively. Separate analysis of only ultrasound positive and negative examinations (i.e., excluding nondiagnostic examinations) confirmed sensitivity and specificity values of 98.8% and 98.3%.

CONCLUSION:

In this largest reported single institution series of ultrasound examinations for appendicitis, we report benchmark standard quality of diagnostic accuracy and visualization rates. Given the radiation and cost implications of CT, there is a strong argument to recommend ultrasound as the primary imaging modality. Diagnostic Study-Level II.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Appendicite / Appendice vermiforme / Référenciation Type d'étude: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: J Pediatr Surg Année: 2016 Type de document: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Appendicite / Appendice vermiforme / Référenciation Type d'étude: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: J Pediatr Surg Année: 2016 Type de document: Article