Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigating different computed tomography techniques for internal target volume definition.
Yoganathan, S A; Maria Das, K J; Subramanian, V Siva; Raj, D Gowtham; Agarwal, Arpita; Kumar, Shaleen.
Affiliation
  • Yoganathan SA; Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Maria Das KJ; Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Subramanian VS; School of Physics, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Raj DG; Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Agarwal A; Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Kumar S; Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 13(6): 994-999, 2017.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29237965
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The aim of this work was to evaluate the various computed tomography (CT) techniques such as fast CT, slow CT, breath-hold (BH) CT, full-fan cone beam CT (FF-CBCT), half-fan CBCT (HF-CBCT), and average CT for delineation of internal target volume (ITV). In addition, these ITVs were compared against four-dimensional CT (4DCT) ITVs. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Three-dimensional target motion was simulated using dynamic thorax phantom with target insert of diameter 3 cm for ten respiration data. CT images were acquired using a commercially available multislice CT scanner, and the CBCT images were acquired using On-Board-Imager. Average CT was generated by averaging 10 phases of 4DCT. ITVs were delineated for each CT by contouring the volume of the target ball; 4DCT ITVs were generated by merging all 10 phases target volumes. Incase of BH-CT, ITV was derived by boolean of CT phases 0%, 50%, and fast CT target volumes.

RESULTS:

ITVs determined by all CT and CBCT scans were significantly smaller (P < 0.05) than the 4DCT ITV, whereas there was no significant difference between average CT and 4DCT ITVs (P = 0.17). Fast CT had the maximum deviation (-46.1% ± 20.9%) followed by slow CT (-34.3% ± 11.0%) and FF-CBCT scans (-26.3% ± 8.7%). However, HF-CBCT scans (-12.9% ± 4.4%) and BH-CT scans (-11.1% ± 8.5%) resulted in almost similar deviation. On the contrary, average CT had the least deviation (-4.7% ± 9.8%).

CONCLUSIONS:

When comparing with 4DCT, all the CT techniques underestimated ITV. In the absence of 4DCT, the HF-CBCT target volumes with appropriate margin may be a reasonable approach for defining the ITV.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique / Tomodensitométrie 4D / Tumeurs du poumon Type d'étude: Diagnostic_studies Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: J Cancer Res Ther Sujet du journal: NEOPLASIAS / TERAPEUTICA Année: 2017 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Inde

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique / Tomodensitométrie 4D / Tumeurs du poumon Type d'étude: Diagnostic_studies Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: J Cancer Res Ther Sujet du journal: NEOPLASIAS / TERAPEUTICA Année: 2017 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Inde