Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of new indigenous "point-of-care" ABO and Rh grouping device.
Tiwari, Aseem Kumar; Setya, Divya; Aggarwal, Geet; Arora, Dinesh; Dara, Ravi C; Ratan, Ankita; Bhardwaj, Gunjan; Acharya, Devi Prasad.
Affiliation
  • Tiwari AK; Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
  • Setya D; Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
  • Aggarwal G; Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
  • Arora D; Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
  • Dara RC; Department of Transfusion Medicine, Manipal Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Ratan A; Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
  • Bhardwaj G; Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
  • Acharya DP; Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
J Lab Physicians ; 10(1): 80-84, 2018.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29403211
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Erycard 2.0 is a "point-of-care" device that is primarily being used for patient blood grouping before transfusion. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Erycard 2.0 was compared with conventional slide technology for accuracy and time taken for ABO and Rh forward grouping result with column agglutination technology (CAT) being the gold standard. Erycard 2.0 as a device was also evaluated for its stability under different storage conditions and stability of result till 48 h. In addition, grouping of hemolyzed samples was also tested with Erycard 2.0. Ease of use of Erycard 2.0 was evaluated with a survey among paramedical staff.

RESULTS:

Erycard 2.0 demonstrated 100% concordance with CAT as compared with slide technique (98.9%). Mean time taken per test by Erycard 2.0 and slide technique was 5.13 min and 1.7 min, respectively. After pretesting storage under different temperature and humidity conditions, Erycard 2.0 did not show any deviation from the result. The result did not change even after 48 h of testing and storage under room temperature. 100% concordance was recorded between pre- and post-hemolyzed blood grouping. Ease of use survey revealed that Erycard 2.0 was more acceptable to paramedical staff for its simplicity, objectivity, and performance than conventional slide technique.

CONCLUSION:

Erycard 2.0 can be used as "point-of-care" device for blood donor screening for ABO and Rh blood group and can possibly replace conventional slide technique.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: J Lab Physicians Année: 2018 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Inde

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: J Lab Physicians Année: 2018 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Inde
...