Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A meta-analysis of narrow-band imaging for the diagnosis of primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Yeung, David Cm; Vlantis, Alexander C; Wong, Eddy Wy; Tong, Michael Cf; Chan, Jason Yk.
Affiliation
  • Yeung DC; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories , Hong Kong.
  • Vlantis AC; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories , Hong Kong.
  • Wong EW; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories , Hong Kong.
  • Tong MC; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories , Hong Kong.
  • Chan JY; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories , Hong Kong.
F1000Res ; 7: 759, 2018.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30026934
ABSTRACT

Background:

Narrow band imaging (NBI), an endoscopic technique featuring an augmented definition of microvasculature and mucosal patterns. NBI is increasingly advocated as a tool to characterize neoplasia and intestinal metaplasia in endoscopic standards, such as for colorectal polyps and tumors. Recently NBI has also been studied in the detection of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC). Here we aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of NBI for the diagnosis of NPC.

Methods:

A meta-analysis of studies comparing narrow-band imaging and white light endoscopy in the diagnosis of primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma was performed. The review process involved two independent investigators. The databases used were MEDLINE, PubMed, the Cochrane library, Embase, and the Web of Science. Statistical analysis was performed with OpenMetaAnalyst, MetaDiSc version 1.4, and Medcalc version 17.9.7. 

Results:

Five studies including 2480 patients were included. The sensitivity and specificity for narrow-band imaging were 0.90 (0.73-0.97) and 0.95 (0.81-0.99) respectively. The positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 18.82 (0.31-82.1) and 0.08 (0.02-0.31). For white light endoscopy, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (0.58-0.89) and 0.91 (0.79-0.96). The positive likelihood ratio was 7.61 (3.61-16.04), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.21 (0.11-0.39). The odds ratio for detection rates between narrow-band imaging and white light endoscopy was 4.29 (0.56-33.03, p = 0.16). Area under the curve for narrow-band imaging was 0.98 (SE 0.02), and for white light it was 0.93 (SE 0.03). There was no significant difference in the receiver operating characteristic curves between the two modalities (p = 0.14).

Conclusion:

Narrow-band imaging showed a higher sensitivity and positive likelihood ratio for the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, there was no significant difference in detection rates compared to white light endoscopy. Further investigation with a uniform diagnostic criteria and terminology is needed for narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Langue: En Journal: F1000Res Année: 2018 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Hong Kong

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Langue: En Journal: F1000Res Année: 2018 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Hong Kong