Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Airflow limitation and survival after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: Results from a systematic review and lung cancer screening trial (NLST-ACRIN sub-study).
Hopkins, R J; Ko, J; Gamble, G D; Young, R P.
Affiliation
  • Hopkins RJ; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland, PO Box 37-971, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Ko J; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland, PO Box 37-971, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Gamble GD; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland, PO Box 37-971, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Young RP; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland, PO Box 37-971, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: roberty@adhb.govt.nz.
Lung Cancer ; 135: 80-87, 2019 09.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31447006
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Lung cancer remains the single greatest cause of cancer mortality where surgery for early stage non-small cell lung cancer achieves the greatest survival. While there is growing optimism for better outcomes with screening using annual computed tomography, the impact of co-existing airflow limitation on survival remains unknown. To compare survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing surgery stratified according to the presence or absence of pre-surgery airflow limitation. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We undertook a systematic literature search of non-screen lung cancer that encompassed studies reported between January 1946 and January 2017. Full-text articles were identified following eligibility scoring, with data extracted and analysed using a standardised analytical method (PRISMA). The results of this systematic review in non-screen lung cancers were compared to real-world results from a lung cancer screening cohort (N = 10,054), where outcomes following surgery could be compared after stratification according to pre-surgery airflow limitation.

RESULTS:

In the systematic review, 6899 subjects were included from 10 studies; 7 were retrospective, 3 were prospective. Overall survival was 950 (44%) in 2144 people with COPD and 2597 (55%) from 4755 controls (unadjusted P value <0.001). However, the overall meta-analysed random effects odds ratio for overall survival (N = 10) and 5-year survival (N = 4) comparing those with and without COPD was 0.91 (95% CI = 0.84-1.00) and 0.99 (95% CI = 0.79-1.24) respectively. There were no signs of significant heterogeneity (I2 = 19.1%, P = 0.27) nor publication bias as assessed by funnel plot and Egger's test (P = 0.19). In the lung cancer screening sub-study of 10,054 screening participants we found no difference in 5-year survival in those with and without airflow limitation (84% and 81% respectively, P = 0.64).

CONCLUSION:

Survival after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer is comparable between those with and without spirometry evidence of airflow limitation. This finding was replicated in lung cancer diagnosed during screening.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Carcinome pulmonaire non à petites cellules / Tumeurs du poumon Type d'étude: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Lung Cancer Sujet du journal: NEOPLASIAS Année: 2019 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Nouvelle-Zélande

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Carcinome pulmonaire non à petites cellules / Tumeurs du poumon Type d'étude: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Lung Cancer Sujet du journal: NEOPLASIAS Année: 2019 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Nouvelle-Zélande
...