Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acellular Dermal Matrix Performance Compared with Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap in Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Patrinely, James Randall; Farinas, Angel; Al-Majed, Bader; Forte, Antonio Jorge; TerKonda, Sarvam; Perdikis, Galen.
Affiliation
  • Patrinely JR; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn.
  • Farinas A; Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.
  • Al-Majed B; Department of Surgery, Maternity and Children Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Forte AJ; Division of Plastic Surgery and Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla.
  • TerKonda S; Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla.
  • Perdikis G; Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 7(9): e2414, 2019 Sep.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31942389
ABSTRACT
Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (LDMF) with tissue expander provides excellent results in breast reconstruction. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been used in expander-based reconstruction (EBR) with good results. This study assesses how ADM compares to LDMF in EBR.

METHODS:

The cohorts comprised 124 patients (218 breasts) who had EBR using ADM between 2006 and 2012, and 242 patients (266 breasts) who had EBR using LDMF between 1994 and 2012. Postoperative complications, reoperations, Breast-Q scores, and objectively assessed aesthetic outcomes were compared.

RESULTS:

Median age was 55 years for both ADM (range 23-84) and LDMF (range 26-88) groups. No statistically significant differences were noted between the groups in the rates of major postoperative complications (P > 0.3). Forty-nine of the 218 (22.5%) in the ADM group and 67 of 266 (25.2%) in the LDMF group had a total of 63 and 84 reoperations, respectively (P = 0.52), with no significant differences in the reoperations rate (P > 0.3). No significant differences were observed in the Breast-Q scores. Some categorical differences were noted in the aesthetic outcomes; however, the difference between the overall outcomes was not significant (P = 0.54).

CONCLUSION:

Our study revealed no statistically significant differences in the complications or reoperation rates, patient satisfaction, or overall aesthetic outcomes when comparing the use of ADM to LDMF in EBR. In conclusion, this study supports the hypothesis that ADM performs as well as LDMF in EBR.

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Année: 2019 Type de document: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Année: 2019 Type de document: Article