A cost-effectiveness analysis after implementation of a fast-track protocol for total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of arthroplasty fast-track protocols, many studies have investigated their effect on complications and length of hospital stay. However, few fast-track studies have examined the long-term effects on cost and health-related quality of life after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to specifically analyze, after implementation of fast-track TKA, cost-effectiveness with functional outcome, length of stay, thromboembolic complications, medical costs, and quality of life after 12 months. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 403 TKA patients treated by a fast-track pathway were compared with 283 patients in a non-fast-track pathway. Length of stay and thromboembolic complications were registered postoperatively. Healthcare costs were based on hospital production costs and calculated on average. Costs were compared with EQ-5D questionnaires to derived quality-adjusted life year (QALY) scores. RESULTS: No between-protocol differences were found in functional outcome and quality of life after TKA. The fast-track protocol reduced the length of stay from a median five days to median three days, and did not influence the thromboembolic complication rate (2.6%). After one-year follow-up for fast-track pathway patients, QALY was 0.85 vs. 0.84 for non-fast-track. A reduction of 268,- euro per patient was calculated in favor of the fast-track protocol. CONCLUSION: Fast-track protocol implementation is a cost-effective strategy for patients undergoing TKA, with high QALY and reduced costs. Fast-track TKA treatment is safe, with low thromboembolic complications. This is the first study to measure fast-track implementation effects on functional outcome and quality of life up to 12 months postoperatively, and calculate equivalent QALYs for both groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.