Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reporting of health-related quality of life endpoints in National Cancer Institute-supported cancer treatment trials.
St Germain, Diane; Denicoff, Andrea; Torres, Andrea; Kelaghan, Joseph; McCaskill-Stevens, Worta; Mishkin, Grace; O'Mara, Ann; Minasian, Lori M.
Affiliation
  • St Germain D; Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Denicoff A; Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Torres A; Health, Environment, Analytics, Resilience & Social Group, ICF, Fairfax, Virginia.
  • Kelaghan J; Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • McCaskill-Stevens W; Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Mishkin G; Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • O'Mara A; Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Minasian LM; Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Cancer ; 126(11): 2687-2693, 2020 06 01.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32237256
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The importance of capturing and reporting health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in clinical trials has been increasingly recognized in the oncology field. As a result, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) began to provide support for correlative HRQOL studies in cancer treatment trials. The current study was conducted to assess the publication rate of HRQOL correlative studies in NCI-supported treatment trials and to identify potential factors positively or negatively associated with publication rates.

METHODS:

The NCI conducted a retrospective review of existing NCI databases to identify cancer treatment trials that had obtained additional NCI funding for the assessment of HRQOL and to determine the extent to which funded HRQOL studies have been completed and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

RESULTS:

Of the 108 included trials, 58 (54%) had a parent trial (PT) publication; of these, 36 trials (62%) had a published HRQOL

result:

20 as an independent publication and 16 that were included and/or reported in the PT publication. The length of time between trial activation and closure, as well as the specific cancer, appeared to be associated with the publication rates.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of the current study demonstrated that approximately 45% of the PT publications were followed by a HRQOL publication within 1 year, to allow the knowledge to be used in patient treatment decision making. The authors believe the current analysis is an important first step toward a better understand of the challenges that researchers face when reporting HRQOL endpoints.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Qualité de vie / Essais cliniques comme sujet / Tumeurs Type d'étude: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limites: Humans Pays/Région comme sujet: America do norte Langue: En Journal: Cancer Année: 2020 Type de document: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Qualité de vie / Essais cliniques comme sujet / Tumeurs Type d'étude: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limites: Humans Pays/Région comme sujet: America do norte Langue: En Journal: Cancer Année: 2020 Type de document: Article