Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Almost 10 years of PET/MR attenuation correction: the effect on lesion quantification with PSMA: clinical evaluation on 200 prostate cancer patients.
Bogdanovic, Borjana; Gafita, Andrei; Schachoff, Sylvia; Eiber, Matthias; Cabello, Jorge; Weber, Wolfgang A; Nekolla, Stephan G.
Affiliation
  • Bogdanovic B; Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany. borjana.bogdanovic@tum.de.
  • Gafita A; Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany.
  • Schachoff S; Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany.
  • Eiber M; Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany.
  • Cabello J; Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany.
  • Weber WA; Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany.
  • Nekolla SG; Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 48(2): 543-553, 2021 02.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32725538
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

After a decade of PET/MR, the case of attenuation correction (AC) remains open. The initial four-compartment (air, water, fat, soft tissue) Dixon-based AC scheme has since been expanded with several features, the latest being MR field-of-view extension and a bone atlas. As this potentially changes quantification, we evaluated the impact of these features in PET AC in prostate cancer patients.

METHODS:

Two hundred prostate cancer patients were examined with either 18F- or 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/MR. Qualitative and quantitative analysis (SUVmean, SUVmax, correlation, and statistical significance) was performed on images reconstructed using different AC schemes Dixon, Dixon+MLAA, Dixon+HUGE, and Dixon+HUGE+bones for 18F-PSMA data; Dixon and Dixon+bones for 68Ga-PSMA data. Uptakes were compared using linear regression against standard Dixon.

RESULTS:

High correlation and no visually perceivable differences between all evaluated methods (r > 0.996) were found. The mean relative difference in lesion uptake of 18F-PSMA and 68Ga-PSMA remained, respectively, within 4% and 3% in soft tissue, and within 10% and 9% in bones for all evaluated methods. Bone registration errors were detected, causing mean uptake change of 5% in affected lesions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on these results and the encountered bone atlas registration inaccuracy, we deduce that including bones and extending the MR field-of-view did not introduce clinically significant differences in PSMA diagnostic accuracy and tracer uptake quantification in prostate cancer pelvic lesions, facilitating the analysis of serial studies respectively. However, in the absence of ground truth data, we advise against atlas-based methods when comparing serial scans for bone lesions.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Tumeurs de la prostate / Imagerie multimodale Type d'étude: Qualitative_research Limites: Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Sujet du journal: MEDICINA NUCLEAR Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Allemagne

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Tumeurs de la prostate / Imagerie multimodale Type d'étude: Qualitative_research Limites: Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Sujet du journal: MEDICINA NUCLEAR Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Allemagne
...