Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pharmacokinetics of Pimobendan and Its Metabolite O-Desmethyl-Pimobendan Following Rectal Administration to Healthy Dogs.
Her, Jiwoong; Kuo, Kendon W; Winter, Randolph L; Cruz-Espindola, Crisanta; Bacek, Lenore M; Boothe, Dawn M.
Affiliation
  • Her J; Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
  • Kuo KW; Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
  • Winter RL; Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
  • Cruz-Espindola C; Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
  • Bacek LM; Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
  • Boothe DM; Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Front Vet Sci ; 7: 423, 2020.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32851013
ABSTRACT

Objective:

This study describes the pharmacokinetics of parent pimobendan (PIM) and its active metabolite, o-desmethyl-pimobendan (ODMP), after oral and rectal administration of pimobendan to healthy dogs. Animals A total of eight healthy privately owned dogs were used in this study. Procedures The dogs received a single dose (0.5 mg/kg) of a commercially available pimobendan tablet per os (PO). Twelve blood samples were collected over a 12-h period for pharmacokinetic analysis. After a 24-h washout period, the dogs received the same dose of pimobendan solution per rectum (PR), and samples were obtained at the same time for analysis.

Results:

For PIM, PO vs. PR, respectively, the mean maximum plasma concentration (C max, ng/ml) was 49.1 ± 28.7 vs. 10.1 ± 2, the time to reach a maximum concentration (T max, h) was 2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 1 ± 0.4, the disappearance half-life (t 1/2, h) was 1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 2.2 ± 0.6, and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC, ng*h/ml) was 148.4 ± 71.6 vs. 31.1 ± 11.9, with relative bioavailability (F, %) of 25 ± 8. For ODMP, PO vs. PR, respectively, C max was 30.9 ± 10.4 vs. 8.8 ± 4.8, T max was 3.2 ± 1.6 vs. 1.7 ± 1.1, and t 1/2 was 5.0 ± 2.7 vs. 8.3 ± 4.8, with AUC of 167.8 ± 36.2 vs. 50.1 ± 19.2 and F of 28 ± 6. The differences between PO and PR were significant (P < 0.03) for AUC and C max for both PIM and ODMP. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance The pharmacokinetics of PIM and ODMP were described following PO and PR administration. The findings suggest that pimobendan PR might achieve effective concentrations and, as such, warrant future studies of clinical effectiveness in treating dogs with congestive heart failure and which are unable to receive medication PO.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Front Vet Sci Année: 2020 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Front Vet Sci Année: 2020 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique