Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating Quality of Life After Facial Reanimation Using the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale in a Series of Pediatric Patients.
Mackay, Duncan J D; Kimia, Rotem; Magee, Leanne; Jackson, Oksana; Nguyen, Phuong D.
Affiliation
  • Mackay DJD; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pennsylvania and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Kimia R; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pennsylvania and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Magee L; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pennsylvania and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Jackson O; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pennsylvania and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Nguyen PD; Division of Pediatric Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(3): 892-895, 2021 May 01.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33086295
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Facial palsy can have significant functional and psychological impact. Dynamic facial reanimation methods have provided means of restoration of smile. There remains a dearth of quality of life data in children. The authors aim to assess patient reported outcomes in this underreported population.

METHODS:

A retrospective review was performed of pediatric patients with facial palsy who had dynamic facial reanimation from 2009 to 2017 at a single institution. Patients were sent a digital Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) questionnaire, a validated tool to assess patient quality of life. FaCE statements are grouped into 6 categories facial movement, facial comfort, oral function, eye comfort, lacrimal control, and social control.

RESULTS:

Twenty patients met inclusion criteria. Fourteen successfully completed the survey. With normal function being 100, our cohort scored facial movement 38.7 ±â€Š14.3; facial comfort 67.3 ±â€Š23, oral function 75 ±â€Š22.7, eye comfort 68.75 ±â€Š18.2, lacrimal control 53.6 ±â€Š32.5, social function 64.3 ±â€Š25.6. The overall FaCE score was 61.07 ±â€Š10.85. The facial movement subscores were lower for brow raise 16.1 ±â€Š33.4 relative to smiling 53.6 ±â€Š29.2 and lip pucker, 46.4 ±â€Š23.7. No correlation was found between facial movement scores and total scores (R2 < 0.01). There was a strong negative correlation between total scores and time since procedure (Spearman's rho R =  -0.45).

CONCLUSION:

Our pediatric facial reanimation cohort demonstrated excellent social function, in contrast to a relatively lower facial movement score. The low facial movement score was mediated by low score for brow raise and was not correlated to overall FaCE score. Interestingly, overall FaCE score tended to decrease with time from procedure.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Paralysie faciale de Bell / Paralysie faciale Type d'étude: Observational_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limites: Child / Humans Langue: En Journal: J Craniofac Surg Sujet du journal: ODONTOLOGIA Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Panama

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Paralysie faciale de Bell / Paralysie faciale Type d'étude: Observational_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limites: Child / Humans Langue: En Journal: J Craniofac Surg Sujet du journal: ODONTOLOGIA Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Panama