Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neuroprotective Effect of Near-Infrared Light in an Animal Model of CI Surgery.
Strübing, Ira; Gröschel, Moritz; Schwitzer, Susanne; Ernst, Arne; Fröhlich, Felix; Jiang, Dan; Boyle, Patrick; Basta, Dietmar.
Affiliation
  • Strübing I; Department Otolaryngology at UKB, University of Berlin, Charité Medical School, Berlin, Germany.
  • Gröschel M; Department Otolaryngology at UKB, University of Berlin, Charité Medical School, Berlin, Germany.
  • Schwitzer S; Department Otolaryngology at UKB, University of Berlin, Charité Medical School, Berlin, Germany.
  • Ernst A; Department Otolaryngology at UKB, University of Berlin, Charité Medical School, Berlin, Germany.
  • Fröhlich F; Department Otolaryngology at UKB, University of Berlin, Charité Medical School, Berlin, Germany.
  • Jiang D; Department Otolaryngology, Guys' and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Boyle P; Advanced Bionics Research Center, Hanover, Germany.
  • Basta D; Department Otolaryngology at UKB, University of Berlin, Charité Medical School, Berlin, Germany, dietmar.basta@rz.hu-berlin.de.
Audiol Neurootol ; 26(2): 95-101, 2021.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33238272
INTRODUCTION: The preservation of residual hearing has become an important consideration in cochlear implant (CI) recipients in recent years. It was the aim of the present animal experimental study to investigate the influence of a pretreatment with near-infrared (NIR) light on preservation of sensory hair cells and residual hearing after cochlear implantation. METHODS: NIR was applied unilaterally (15 min, 808 nm, 120 mW) to 8 guinea pigs, immediately before a bilateral scala tympani CI electrode insertion was performed. The nonirradiated (contralateral) side served as control. Twenty-eight days postoperatively, auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were registered from both ears to screen for hearing loss. Thereafter, the animals were sacrificed and inner hair cells (IHCs) and outer hair cells (OHCs) were counted and compared between NIR-pretreated and control (contralateral) cochleae. RESULTS: There was no IHC loss upon cochlear implantation. OHC loss was most prominent on both sides at the apical part of the cochlea. NIR pretreatment led to a statistically significant reduction in OHC loss (by 39.8%). ABR recordings (across the frequencies 4-32 kHz) showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups and corresponds well with the apical structural damage. Hearing loss was reduced by about 20 dB on average for the NIR-pretreated group (p ≤ 0.05). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: A single NIR pretreatment in this animal model of CI surgery appears to be neuroprotective for residual hearing. This is in line with other studies where several NIR posttreatments have protected cochlear and other neural tissues. NIR pretreatment is an inexpensive, effective, and noninvasive approach that can complement other ways of preserving residual hearing and, hence, should deserve further clinical evaluation in CI patients.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Rampe tympanique / Implants cochléaires / Cochlée / Implantation cochléaire / Neuroprotection / Ouïe / Rayons infrarouges Limites: Animals / Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: Audiol Neurootol Sujet du journal: AUDIOLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Allemagne Pays de publication: Suisse

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Rampe tympanique / Implants cochléaires / Cochlée / Implantation cochléaire / Neuroprotection / Ouïe / Rayons infrarouges Limites: Animals / Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: Audiol Neurootol Sujet du journal: AUDIOLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Allemagne Pays de publication: Suisse