Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictors of orthodontic treatment conclusion: A historical cohort study.
Di Guida, Luís Antônio; Collares, Kauê Faria; Borba, Márcia; Matias, Murilo; Benetti, Paula.
Affiliation
  • Di Guida LA; Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões, Erechim, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
  • Collares KF; Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
  • Borba M; Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
  • Matias M; Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Guarulhos University, Guarulhos, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Benetti P; Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Electronic address: paulabenetti@upf.br.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 159(2): e179-e185, 2021 Feb.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33483219
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The study investigated which patient and orthodontic treatment factors act as predictors for the conclusion of the ongoing treatment in a dental clinic of a specialization program in Orthodontics.

METHODS:

Data were collected from the records of patients treated from 1997 to 2015. Potential predictors for treatment conclusion were investigated patient-related factors (PRFs) and treatment-related factors (TRFs). PRFs were sex, age, face balance, Angle malocclusion classification, open bite, denture, facial pattern, facial profile, buccal corridor, crossbite, maxillary deficiency, and sagittal mandibular behavior; and TRFs were therapeutic approaches, treatment modality, extractions, and Bolton discrepancy. The initial and final treatment dates were collected. Descriptive data analysis, univariate, and multivariate logistic regression were performed (5% significance).

RESULTS:

Of the 903 records, 561 patients were included in the study. It was demonstrated that starting the treatment at a young age (PRF) and the presence of crossbite (TRF) are predictive factors for the treatment conclusion. A vertical facial pattern (dolichofacial or brachyfacial) and a greater number of extractions for orthodontic reasons may contribute positively to the conclusion of the treatment. The frequency of treatment inconclusion was higher during the first 2 years of treatment (more than 50% of the patients that initiated the treatment).

CONCLUSIONS:

Young age at the beginning of treatment and the presence of crossbite malocclusion can increase the chance of treatment conclusion.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Béance dentaire / Malocclusion dentaire Type d'étude: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Sujet du journal: ODONTOLOGIA / ORTODONTIA Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Brésil

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Béance dentaire / Malocclusion dentaire Type d'étude: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Sujet du journal: ODONTOLOGIA / ORTODONTIA Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Brésil