Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mobile apps for detecting falsified and substandard drugs: A systematic review.
Ciapponi, Agustín; Donato, Manuel; Gülmezoglu, A Metin; Alconada, Tomás; Bardach, Ariel.
Affiliation
  • Ciapponi A; Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Donato M; Centro de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Salud Pública (CIESP-IECS), CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Gülmezoglu AM; Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Alconada T; Centro de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Salud Pública (CIESP-IECS), CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Bardach A; Department of Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246061, 2021.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33539433
ABSTRACT
The use of substandard and counterfeit medicines (SCM) leads to significant health and economic consequences, like treatment failure, rise of antimicrobial resistance, extra expenditures of individuals or households and serious adverse drug reactions including death. Our objective was to systematically search, identify and compare relevant available mobile applications (apps) for smartphones and tablets, which use could potentially affect clinical and public health outcomes. We carried out a systematic review of the literature in January 2020, including major medical databases, and app stores. We used the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) to assess the quality of apps, (1 worst score, 3 acceptable score, and 5 best score). We planned to evaluate the accuracy of the mobile apps to detect SCM. We retrieved 335 references through medical databases and 42 from Apple, Google stores and Google Scholar. We finally included two studies of the medical database, 25 apps (eight from the App Store, eight from Google Play, eight from both stores, and one from Google Scholar), and 16 websites. We only found one report on the accuracy of a mobile apps detecting SCMs. Most apps use the imprint, color or shape for pill identification, and only a few offer pill detection through photographs or bar code. The MARS mean score for the apps was 3.17 (acceptable), with a maximum of 4.9 and a minimum of 1.1. The 'functionality' dimension resulted in the highest mean score (3.4), while the 'engagement' and 'information' dimensions showed the lowest one (3.0). In conclusion, we found a remarkable evidence gap about the accuracy of mobile apps in detecting SCMs. However, mobile apps could potentially be useful to screen for SCM by assessing the physical characteristics of pills, although this should still be assessed in properly designed research studies.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Applications mobiles / Médicaments non conformes aux normes Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: PLoS One Sujet du journal: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Argentine

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Applications mobiles / Médicaments non conformes aux normes Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: PLoS One Sujet du journal: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Argentine
...