Reproducibility of radiomic features in SENSE and compressed SENSE: impact of acceleration factors.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of acceleration factors on reproducibility of radiomic features in sensitivity encoding (SENSE) and compressed SENSE (CS), compare between SENSE and CS, and identify reproducible radiomic features. METHODS: Three-dimensional turbo spin echo T1-weighted imaging was performed in 14 healthy volunteers (mean age, 57 years; range, 33-67 years; 7 men) under SENSE and CS with accelerator factors of 5.5, 6.8, and 9.7. Eight anatomical locations (brain parenchyma, salivary glands, masseter muscle, tongue, pharyngeal mucosal space, eyeballs) were evaluated. Reproducibility of radiomic features was evaluated by calculating concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) in reference to the original image (SENSE with acceleration factor of 3.5). Reproducibility of radiomic features among acceleration factors and between SENSE and CS was compared. RESULTS: Proportion of radiomic features with CCC > 0.85 in reference to the original image was lower with higher acceleration factors in both SENSE and CS across all anatomical locations (p < .001). Proportion of radiomic features with CCC > 0.85 in reference to the original image was higher in SENSE compared with CS (SENSE, 6.7-7.3% vs CS, 4.4-5.0%; p < .001). Run percentage of gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM) with wavelet D showed CCC > 0.85 in reference to the original image in both SENSE and CS at acceleration factor of 9.7 in the highest number of anatomical locations. CONCLUSIONS: Higher acceleration factors resulted in lower reproducibility of radiomic features in both SENSE and CS, and SENSE showed higher reproducibility of radiomic features than CS in reference to the original image. Run percentage of GLRLM with wavelet D was identified as the most reproducible feature. KEY POINTS • Reproducibility of radiomic features in reference to the original image was lower with higher acceleration factors in both sensitivity encoding (SENSE) and compressed SENSE (CS) across all anatomical locations (p < .001). • SENSE showed higher proportions of radiomic features with CCC > 0.85 in reference to the original image (SENSE, 6.7-7.3% vs CS, 4.4-5.0%; p < .001) compared with CS. • Run percentage of gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM) with wavelet D showed CCC > 0.85 in reference to the original image in both SENSE and CS with the highest acceleration factor.