Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic model for pancreatic cancer using a multi-biomarker panel.
Choi, Yoo Jin; Yoon, Woongchang; Lee, Areum; Han, Youngmin; Byun, Yoonhyeong; Kang, Jae Seung; Kim, Hongbeom; Kwon, Wooil; Suh, Young-Ah; Kim, Yongkang; Lee, Seungyeoun; Namkung, Junghyun; Han, Sangjo; Choi, Yonghwan; Heo, Jin Seok; Park, Joon Oh; Park, Joo Kyung; Kim, Song Cheol; Kang, Chang Moo; Lee, Woo Jin; Park, Taesung; Jang, Jin-Young.
Affiliation
  • Choi YJ; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Yoon W; Bio-MAX/N-Bio Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee A; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Han Y; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Byun Y; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kang JS; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim H; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kwon W; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Suh YA; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim Y; Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee S; Department of Applied Mathematics, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Namkung J; Data Labs, AI Center, SK Telecom, Seoul, Korea.
  • Han S; Data Labs, AI Center, SK Telecom, Seoul, Korea.
  • Choi Y; Data Labs, AI Center, SK Telecom, Seoul, Korea.
  • Heo JS; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park JO; Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park JK; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • Kim SC; Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kang CM; Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea.
  • Lee WJ; Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park T; Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • Jang JY; Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Surg Treat Res ; 100(3): 144-153, 2021 Mar.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33748028
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Diagnostic biomarkers of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have been used for early detection to reduce its dismal survival rate. However, clinically feasible biomarkers are still rare. Therefore, in this study, we developed an automated multi-marker enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit using 3 biomarkers (leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein [LRG1], transthyretin [TTR], and CA 19-9) that were previously discovered and proposed a diagnostic model for PDAC based on this kit for clinical usage.

METHODS:

Individual LRG1, TTR, and CA 19-9 panels were combined into a single automated ELISA panel and tested on 728 plasma samples, including PDAC (n = 381) and normal samples (n = 347). The consistency between individual panels of 3 biomarkers and the automated multi-panel ELISA kit were accessed by correlation. The diagnostic model was developed using logistic regression according to the automated ELISA kit to predict the risk of pancreatic cancer (high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups).

RESULTS:

The Pearson correlation coefficient of predicted values between the triple-marker automated ELISA panel and the former individual ELISA was 0.865. The proposed model provided reliable prediction results with a positive predictive value of 92.05%, negative predictive value of 90.69%, specificity of 90.69%, and sensitivity of 92.05%, which all simultaneously exceed 90% cutoff value.

CONCLUSION:

This diagnostic model based on the triple ELISA kit showed better diagnostic performance than previous markers for PDAC. In the future, it needs external validation to be used in the clinic.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Langue: En Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Année: 2021 Type de document: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Langue: En Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Année: 2021 Type de document: Article