Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Addressing Health Literacy in Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards.
Muscat, Danielle M; Smith, Jenna; Mac, Olivia; Cadet, Tamara; Giguere, Anik; Housten, Ashley J; Langford, Aisha T; Smith, Sian K; Durand, Marie-Anne; McCaffery, Kirsten.
Affiliation
  • Muscat DM; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Smith J; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Mac O; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Cadet T; School of Social Work, Simmons University, Boston MA, USA.
  • Giguere A; Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Housten AJ; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.
  • Langford AT; Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
  • Smith SK; Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health. New York, NY, USA.
  • Durand MA; Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • McCaffery K; Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Med Decis Making ; 41(7): 848-869, 2021 10.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34053361
BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of the importance of addressing health literacy in patient decision aid (PtDA) development. PURPOSE: An updated review as part of IPDAS 2.0 examined the extent to which PtDAs are designed to meet the needs of people with low health literacy/socially-disadvantaged populations. DATA SOURCES: Reference lists of Cochrane reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PtDAs (2014, 2017, and upcoming 2021 versions). STUDY SELECTION: RCTs that assessed the impact of PtDAs on low health literacy or other socially-disadvantaged groups (i.e., ≥50% participants from socially-disadvantaged groups and/or subgroup analysis in socially-disadvantaged group/s). DATA EXTRACTION: Two researchers independently extracted data into a standardized form including PtDA development and evaluation details. We searched online repositories and emailed authors to access PtDAs to verify grade reading level, understandability, and actionability. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-five of 213 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, illustrating that only 12% of studies addressed the needs of low health literacy or other socially-disadvantaged groups. Grade reading level was calculated in 8 of 25 studies (33%), which is recommended in previous IPDAS guidelines. We accessed and independently assessed 11 PtDAs. None were written at sixth-grade level or below. Ten PtDAs met the recommended threshold for understandability, but only 5 met the recommended threshold for actionability. We also conducted a post hoc subgroup meta-analysis and found that knowledge improvements after receiving a PtDA were greater in studies that reported using strategies to reduce cognitive demand in PtDA development compared with studies that did not (χ2 = 14.11, P = 0.0002, I2 = 92.9%). LIMITATIONS: We were unable to access 13 of 24 PtDAs. Conclusions. Greater attention to health literacy and socially-disadvantaged populations is needed in the field of PtDAs to ensure equity in decision support.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Compétence informationnelle en santé Type d'étude: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Patient_preference Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Med Decis Making Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Australie Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Compétence informationnelle en santé Type d'étude: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Patient_preference Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Med Decis Making Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Australie Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique