Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effects of two-handed jaw thrust on i-gel™ placement in anesthetized non-paralyzed patients.
Huh, Hyub; Cho, Jang E; Lee, Suk W; Kim, Hyun-Chang.
Affiliation
  • Huh H; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Kangdong, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Cho JE; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee SW; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim HC; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea - onidori1979@gmail.com.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 87(10): 1109-1116, 2021 10.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34676743
BACKGROUND: I-gelTM is a second-generation supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff. In this prospective randomized investigation, we evaluated the effects of two-handed jaw thrust technique on i-gel insertion in anesthetized non-paralyzed patients. METHODS: Seventy-four adult patients were allocated to two groups (N.=37 each). In the jaw thrust group, two-handed jaw thrust technique was applied to facilitate i-gel insertion. In the control group, conventional i-gel insertion was performed. The success rate at the first attempt, air leakage pressure, insertion time, and postoperative sore throat incidence were recorded. RESULTS: The success rate at the first attempt was higher in the jaw thrust group (37 [100%] vs. 31 [84%], difference of 16%, 95% confidence interval for the difference: 1 to 33%, P=0.03). The median air leakage pressure was higher in the jaw thrust group than in the control group (20 [interquartile range 13] vs. 17 [interquartile range 3] cmH2O, difference: 6, 95% confidence interval of the difference: 3 to 8, P<0.01). The mean insertion time was shorter in the jaw thrust group (27±14 vs. 41±29 seconds, difference: 14 seconds, 95% confidence interval of the difference: 3 to 24, P=0.01). The incidence of postoperative sore throat at the postoperative one hour was lower in the jaw thrust group (seven [20%] vs. 15 [41%], difference 22%, 95% confidence interval for the difference: -1 to 42%, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The two-handed jaw thrust technique facilitated i-gel insertion compared to the conventional technique in anesthetized non-paralyzed patients.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Pharyngite / Masques laryngés Type d'étude: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Adult / Humans Langue: En Journal: Minerva Anestesiol Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Corée du Sud Pays de publication: Italie

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Pharyngite / Masques laryngés Type d'étude: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Adult / Humans Langue: En Journal: Minerva Anestesiol Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Corée du Sud Pays de publication: Italie